Essays Tagged "Washington Post"

Page 2 of 2

U.S. Elections Are a Mess, Even Though There’s No Evidence This One Was Hacked

Unproven reports of possible discrepancies in the Rust Belt just show how untrustworthy the system is.

  • Bruce Schneier
  • The Washington Post
  • November 23, 2016

Was the 2016 presidential election hacked? It’s hard to tell. There were no obvious hacks on Election Day, but new reports have raised the question of whether voting machines were tampered with in three states that Donald Trump won this month: Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

The researchers behind these reports include voting rights lawyer John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, both respected in the community. They have been talking with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, but their analysis is not yet public…

Your WiFi-Connected Thermostat Can Take Down the Whole Internet. We Need New Regulations.

  • Bruce Schneier
  • The Washington Post
  • November 3, 2016

Late last month, popular websites like Twitter, Pinterest, Reddit and PayPal went down for most of a day. The distributed denial-of-service attack that caused the outages, and the vulnerabilities that made the attack possible, was as much a failure of market and policy as it was of technology. If we want to secure our increasingly computerized and connected world, we need more government involvement in the security of the “Internet of Things” and increased regulation of what are now critical and life-threatening technologies. It’s no longer a question of if, it’s a question of when…

By November, Russian Hackers Could Target Voting Machines

If Russia really is responsible, there's no reason political interference would end with the DNC emails.

  • Bruce Schneier
  • The Washington Post
  • July 27, 2016

Russia was behind the hacks into the Democratic National Committee’s computer network that led to the release of thousands of internal emails just before the party’s convention began, U.S. intelligence agencies have reportedly concluded.

The FBI is investigating. WikiLeaks promises there is more data to come. The political nature of this cyberattack means that Democrats and Republicans are trying to spin this as much as possible. Even so, we have to accept that someone is attacking our nation’s computer systems in an apparent attempt to influence a presidential election. This kind of cyberattack targets the very core of our democratic process. And it points to the possibility of an even worse problem in November — that our election systems and our voting machines could be vulnerable to a similar attack…

Your iPhone Just Got Less Secure. Blame the FBI.

When Johns Hopkins discovered a different security flaw, it notified Apple so the problem could be fixed. The FBI is keeping its newly found breach a secret from everyone.

  • Bruce Schneier
  • The Washington Post
  • March 29, 2016

The FBI’s legal battle with Apple is over, but the way it ended may not be good news for anyone.

Federal agents had been seeking to compel Apple to break the security of an iPhone 5c that had been used by one of the San Bernardino, Calif., terrorists. Apple had been fighting a court order to cooperate with the FBI, arguing that the authorities’ request was illegal and that creating a tool to break into the phone was itself harmful to the security of every iPhone user worldwide.

Last week, the FBI told the court it had learned of a possible way to break into the phone…

Why You Should Side With Apple, Not the FBI, in the San Bernardino iPhone Case

Either everyone gets security, or no one does.

  • Bruce Schneier
  • The Washington Post
  • February 18, 2016

Earlier this week, a federal magistrate ordered Apple to assist the FBI in hacking into the iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters. Apple will fight this order in court.

The policy implications are complicated. The FBI wants to set a precedent that tech companies will assist law enforcement in breaking their users’ security, and the technology community is afraid that the precedent will limit what sorts of security features it can offer customers. The FBI sees this as a privacy vs. security debate, while the tech community sees it as a security vs. surveillance debate…

Baseball’s New Metal Detectors Won’t Keep You Safe. They’ll Just Make You Miss a Few Innings

Security theater meets America's pastime.

  • Bruce Schneier
  • The Washington Post
  • April 14, 2015

Fans attending Major League Baseball games are being greeted in a new way this year: with metal detectors at the ballparks. Touted as a counterterrorism measure, they’re nothing of the sort. They’re pure security theater: They look good without doing anything to make us safer. We’re stuck with them because of a combination of buck passing, CYA thinking and fear.

As a security measure, the new devices are laughable. The ballpark metal detectors are much more lax than the ones at an airport checkpoint. They aren’t very sensitive — people with phones and keys in their pockets are …

The ID Chip You Don't Want in Your Passport

  • Bruce Schneier
  • Washington Post
  • September 16, 2006

This essay also appeared in San Jose Mercury News, Sacramento Bee, Concord Monitor, Fort Worth Star Telegram, Dallas Morning News, Contra Costa Times, Statesman Journal, and The Clarion-Ledger.

If you have a passport, now is the time to renew it — even if it’s not set to expire anytime soon. If you don’t have a passport and think you might need one, now is the time to get it. In many countries, including the United States, passports will soon be equipped with RFID chips. And you don’t want one of these chips in your passport.

RFID stands for “radio-frequency identification.” Passports with RFID chips store an electronic copy of the passport information: your name, a digitized picture, etc. And in the future, the chip might store fingerprints or digital visas from various countries…

Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.