Simultaneous Discovery of Vulnerabilities
In the conversation about zero-day vulnerabilities and whether "good" governments should disclose or hoard vulnerabilities, one of the critical variables is independent discovery. That is, if it is unlikely that someone else will independently discover an NSA-discovered vulnerability -- the NSA calls this "NOBUS," for "nobody but us" -- then it is not unreasonable for the NSA to keep that vulnerability secret and use it for attack. If, on the other hand, it is likely that someone else will discover and use it, then they should probably disclose it to the vendor and get it patched.
The likelihood partly depends on whether vulnerabilities are sparse or dense. But that assumes that vulnerability discovery is random. And there's a lot of evidence that it's not.
For example, there's a new new GNU C vulnerability that lay dormant for years and was independently discovered by multiple researchers, all around the same time.
It remains unclear why or how glibc maintainers allowed a bug of this magnitude to be introduced into their code, remain undiscovered for seven years, and then go unfixed for seven months following its report. By Google's account, the bug was independently uncovered by at least two and possibly three separate groups who all worked to have it fixed. It wouldn't be surprising if over the years the vulnerability was uncovered by additional people and possibly exploited against unsuspecting targets.
Similarly, Heartbleed lay dormant for years before it was independently discovered by both Codenomicon and Google.
This is not uncommon. It's almost like there's something in the air that makes a particular vulnerability shallow and easy to discover. This implies that NOBUS is not a useful concept.
Posted on February 25, 2016 at 1:14 PM • 29 Comments