Bruce Schneier | |||||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « A Critical Essay on the TSA | Main | Report on Chinese Cyberwarfare Capability » October 29, 2009DDNI for Collection Press ConferenceThe U.S. Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Collection gives a press conference on the new Utah data collection facility: video and transcript. Posted on October 29, 2009 at 12:59 PM • 7 Comments To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. Simon • October 29, 2009 4:21 PM Video broken, but I read the transcript. I guess I'm a little unclear what the mission of this new facility is, because we hear a lot about monitoring / data collection, yet the press conference language focuses on attacks - the type of attacks that disable. uk visa • October 29, 2009 5:35 PM It's not a great read but it is worth reading, if for no other reason for seeing how little Mr Gaffney told them... a clip below (Bruce, I hope it's OK to copy it here). QUESTION: Could you talk a little bit about what kind of data will be screened at the center? How does it work? MR. GAFFNEY: I can’t get into some of the specific details of the kind of work that will go on at the center because it is a critical aspect of the way we are looking at doing cybersecurity going QUESTION: And if we can’t understand what you’re doing, how do we know that you’re not infringing on personal freedoms? MR. GAFFNEY: Okay, well, one of the key ways, as the governor talked about – the checks and balances. You have a fantastic set of elected representatives and senators who provide oversight The level of trust that is established between the Intelligence Community, the entire cybersecurity Not From Utah • October 29, 2009 7:52 PM MAJOR GENERAL BRIAN TARBET (Adjutant General, Utah National Guard): .... and it also allows us to identify the innocents and to target and eliminate the threats. How will they "identify the innocent"?? RF • October 29, 2009 10:37 PM Happy that someone asked the questions -- go Utah libertarians, I guess -- but of course there weren't really answers. All of the checks and balances Gaffney talked about existed throughout the warrantless wiretapping program and didn't do anything -- even though Congress and the public clearly cared once it was leaked! (And even though people of all political stripes agree the NSA broke the law.) It's practically a contradiction to call that a well-functioning system of oversight. And as Simon said, you don't need datacenters to defend against "cyberattackers." You need them to sift through wiretaps, intercepted Internet traffic, and the like. BF Skinner • October 30, 2009 10:25 AM "So that when your elected representatives stand up and say, we have provided oversight, and we know that this is being done consistent with our laws and with our liberties, that’s what makes government work. So I cannot thank these men enough. " Okay so the ranking member of the intelligence committee got a MAJOR federal facility into his constituacy. Make no mistake 5000 jobs up front and hundreds of operational jobs is as good as a military base. The SAME guy who's got to be the legal watchdog. Conflict of interest? @Not From Utah "How will they "identify the innocent"??" Oh Easy peasy. The innocent will be those people who's information they aren't intercepting or collecting. Dom De Vitto • October 30, 2009 3:35 PM @Not From Utah >>How will they "identify the innocent"?? Easy - Register of deaths, births and marriages. All babies are innocent - at birth at least. Everyone else is guilty, because the law ensures it, through it's breadth and complexity. Dom
Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type. Photo at top by Geoffrey Stone.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments