US Bans All Foreign-Made Consumer Routers

This is for new routers; you don’t have to throw away your existing ones:

The Executive Branch determination noted that foreign-produced routers (1) introduce “a supply chain vulnerability that could disrupt the U.S. economy, critical infrastructure, and national defense” and (2) pose “a severe cybersecurity risk that could be leveraged to immediately and severely disrupt U.S. critical infrastructure and directly harm U.S. persons.”

More information:

Any new router made outside the US will now need to be approved by the FCC before it can be imported, marketed, or sold in the country.

In order to get that approval, companies manufacturing routers outside the US must apply for conditional approval in a process that will require the disclosure of the firm’s foreign investors or influence, as well as a plan to bring the manufacturing of the routers to the US.

Certain routers may be exempted from the list if they are deemed acceptable by the Department of Defense or the Department of Homeland Security, the FCC said. Neither agency has yet added any specific routers to its list of equipment exceptions.

[…]

Popular brands of router in the US include Netgear, a US company, which manufactures all of its products abroad.

One exception to the general absence of US-made routers is the newer Starlink WiFi router. Starlink is part of Elon Musk’s company SpaceX.

Presumably US companies will start making home routers, if they think this policy is stable enough to plan around. But they will be more expensive than routers made in China or Taiwan. Security is never free, but policy determines who pays for it.

Posted on April 2, 2026 at 1:28 PM6 Comments

Comments

Who? April 2, 2026 1:32 PM

Right now, I am not really sure US-manufactured devices are the most clever choice… better using open-source devices whose firmware has been written by an international team of qualified developers.

US has become an odd player in the international playground.

Who? April 2, 2026 1:38 PM

U.S. corporations have a long history of bad practices, including installing backdoors on their own devices (Cisco, Juniper, Fortinet…); these ones are certainly not the devices I would consider for a secure environment.

Who? April 2, 2026 1:49 PM

For consumer routers, I would choose a small open-source device with a suitable ONT, compatible with the service provider network, and operating system—either OpenWrt, for less technically savvy customers, or an OpenBSD-based design.

Chris April 2, 2026 2:25 PM

Sounds like a great opportunity for the cartel…er, I mean administration…to set the stage for government surveillance.

KathyRo April 2, 2026 3:16 PM

Security is never free.. and in this case it’s not even secure.

I wouldn’t trust the US government to keep their mitts off those routers under any administration but especially the current one.

Dumb questions April 2, 2026 3:18 PM

Former Can PM Steve Harper’s gov banned huawei equipment years ago … I think security was the reason.

Who certifies that chinese made equipment doesnt have backdoors?

Who certifies that open source equipment doesnt have backdoors?

Arent all of these vulnerable to side channel attacks?

Arent any of these vulnerable if theyre unpatched, which they are likely unpatched because youre supposed to buy a new one rather than maintain the existing one?

i ask because honestly i dont know

You’d think monitoring your outbound traffic would be more important.

Leave a comment

Blog moderation policy

Login

Allowed HTML <a href="URL"> • <em> <cite> <i> • <strong> <b> • <sub> <sup> • <ul> <ol> <li> • <blockquote> <pre> Markdown Extra syntax via https://michelf.ca/projects/php-markdown/extra/

Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.