Bruce Schneier | |||||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « Difficult-to-Pronounce Things are Judged to Be More Risky | Main | HIPAA Accountability in Stimulus Bill » February 18, 2009Computer Virus Epidemiology"WiFi networks and malware epidemiology," by Hao Hu, Steven Myers, Vittoria Colizza, and Alessandro Vespignani. Abstract Honestly, I'm not sure I understood most of the article. And I don't think that their model is all that great. But I like to see these sorts of methods applied to malware and infection rates. EDITED TO ADD (3/13): Earlier -- but free -- version of the paper. Posted on February 18, 2009 at 5:53 AM • 10 Comments To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. Calum • February 18, 2009 6:20 AM I'm kinda with Bruce on this one. Are they talking about malware running on the router itself? In which case, I can kind of understand you might have a problem. On the other hand, it's one easily dealt with by not running a monoculture. Josh O. • February 18, 2009 6:36 AM I don't think multi-culture is a panacea though. It just makes the most successful worms the ones that are able to exploit multiple platforms at once. If some one waited and got a hand full of exploits on many different systems, and took the time to make their worm portable to multiple platforms, I think we would be in trouble. Adding router exploits to the list is even more potent, since that is many home network's first line of defense. Routers are probably less likely to be patched, and the options for running a different OS on any particular brand of router is very limited to the average joe. Nicholas Weaver • February 18, 2009 7:29 AM Is there a copy not behind a paywall? And I'm reminded of this Usenix Security paper from a year or two ago: Douglas Leeder • February 18, 2009 7:54 AM I've found a copy not behind a paywall: Different titles, but same authors and abstract. waitwhatwhoa • February 18, 2009 8:58 AM see also: http://sysnet.ucsd.edu/~cfleizac/publications/... which applies a similar methodology to the propagation of worms through cell phone networks via the phones' address books. PiP • February 18, 2009 12:01 PM In a real-world environment this type of attack is currently very low-risk; re-flashing the firmware on a typical router is a difficult process that usually takes multiple attempts, hardware resets, and often ends in failure. If a skilled and deliberate firmware upgrade has such a low success rate, I doubt that any malware will be able to successfully spread through it. Compare it to a disease that kills its victim before it has a chance to spread to other hosts. Davi Ottenheimer • February 18, 2009 12:06 PM "I like to see these sorts of methods applied" Reads like a movie plot to me -- snakes on your router. Mike W • February 18, 2009 4:55 PM There are a few flaws in the analysis, including: This was a good effort, but mostly undone by a very casual analysis of the underlying technologies associated with wireless technologies. A more likely scenario is an infection of mobile phones enabled by those annoying bluetooth earphones ("snakes on your blackberry") Mike W laptop asus • May 26, 2010 4:47 AM In a real-world environment this type of attack is currently very low-risk; re-flashing the firmware on a typical router is a difficult process that usually takes multiple attempts,
Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type. Photo at top by Geoffrey Stone.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments