Bruce Schneier | |||||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « KeeLoq Broken | Main | New Security Cartoon Site » September 14, 2007Chinese National Firewall Isn't All that EffectiveInteresting research: The study, carried out by graduate student Earl Barr and colleagues in the computer science department of UC Davis and the University of New Mexico, exploited the workings of the Chinese firewall to investigate its effectiveness. Posted on September 14, 2007 at 7:52 AM • 15 Comments To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. Anonymous • September 14, 2007 8:27 AM The other article is much more interesting and detailed than the BBC report. Thanks for the link, Bruce. More interesting than the technology is the inference that "the Great Firewall of China doesn't have to block every illicit word out there—only enough so that users conduct self-censorship because they know their online movements are being watched." Patriot Act et al, anyone? Wicked Lad • September 14, 2007 8:30 AM Very interesting. It would be gratifying if our experience with spam could be put to good use in subverting Chinese censorship (as covered in the eWeek article). Gavin • September 14, 2007 9:20 AM Interesting, seems very similar to previous work done by Richard Clayton el al. Jason • September 14, 2007 10:01 AM The Thai censorship "firewall" is similar. There is not very much perimeter security, but the ministry of communication requires ISPs to filter sites it has blacklisted. Next there are laws which ban discussion of certain political topics or people and also circumvention of the censorship technology (so using TOR is now illegal). Enforcement is also nonstandard: recently a webmaster from a forum covering a sensitive subject went missing for some weeks, not arrested, but abducted by the police. But without doubt the largest obstruction to free discourse is self-censorship, since it is a cultural construct, not a legal one. If your strategy is to minimize total damage (i.e. dangerous or unsafe ideas among the public), then this is a classic defense-in-depth technique and it is very effective. Many Thais are either unaware or unwilling to discuss pivotal events from the country's history. I can only assume China is similar or even more scary. David Harper • September 14, 2007 10:02 AM It's a pity that the Chinese National Firewall doesn't also block outgoing email traffic containing phrases such as "penis enlargement", "herbal viagra" and "cheap meds". Now *that* would be a useful service to the rest of the world. Brian • September 14, 2007 10:03 AM If the firewall was actually effective, maybe they'd use it to stop the flow of malware from their networks to the rest of the world. They continue to be a major source of mal traffic due to all the zombied machines. Johnny B Good • September 14, 2007 10:08 AM Off topic, but Bruce have you seen this? DigitalCommando • September 14, 2007 10:13 AM If we were to burrow deep into the chinese democracy suppression machine, we may find that their "internet filter" is actually just a block of uncooked saimin noodles. adam hazzlebank • September 14, 2007 10:31 AM It was my understanding that the web filtering is actually implemented at the ISP level (I may be wrong, and I can't find a source right now). The Chinese government says "don't embarrass us" and the ISP has to figure out how exactly to do the filtering. That would explain why the filtering is somewhat patchy. Avery • September 14, 2007 10:33 AM Given the fact that the Chinese are still quite sensitive about the Nanking Massacre, I am surprised that they block references to the Nazi Germany. I would think they'd be all over any opportunity to compare WWII Japan with WWII Germany. Anyone know what their reasoning behind this is? Kadin2048 • September 14, 2007 12:38 PM Avery: "I would think they'd be all over any opportunity to compare WWII Japan with WWII Germany. Anyone know what their reasoning behind this is?" Perhaps because they're more afraid of comparisons between the current government and Nazi Germany? That's the only thing that comes to mind to me. If that's the case, it's certainly interesting. Anonymous • September 14, 2007 2:02 PM @kadin, avery: Dr Hu • September 14, 2007 4:46 PM I think the easiest way to beat the Great Firewall might be to format the text with forced line breaks so that the message reads in columns, with the lines being gibberish. All Chinese characters in a given font have the same width, so they align perfectly. Thus, a message like "123456789" would be written like this: 741 It shouldn't be too hard to write a program to do this automatically. As to self-censorship, I did suggest caution to a friend of mine after she told me in an e-mail she was unhappy about the one-child policy. I wouldn't try to stop her if she publicly criticized the government on purpose (I would worry for her, though), but I'd hate to see her get in trouble just for being careless. Dr Yubi Hu (��?逾��?) (No, that's not my real name. I am a Ph.D., though.) roy_hu • September 14, 2007 10:21 PM I just found this paper http://www.cs.unm.edu/~crandall/... which has been accepted to CCS 07.
Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type. Photo at top by Geoffrey Stone.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments