Arguing for NSA-Level Internet Surveillance
Jack Goldsmith argues that we need the NSA to surveil the Internet not for terrorism reasons, but for cyberespionage and cybercrime reasons. Daniel Gallington argues—the headline has nothing to do with the content—that the balance between surveillance and privacy is about right.
Frank Wilhoit • October 29, 2013 6:40 AM
So this is what it comes down to: a debate — sterile, even if it had not already been foreclosed — between “let’s take our chances” and “we have no chances”.
Without surveillance: inestimable risk of unknowable disaster.
With surveillance: the absolute certainty, a priori, of utter and continuous degradation.
When you look at it this way, it becomes clear that the degradation is the point. Surveillance has no other purpose than to humiliate. It is purely a manifestation of sadism.