The Security of the Mega File-Sharing Service
Ever since the launch of Kim Dotcom’s file-sharing service, I have been asked about the unorthodox encryption and security system.
I have not reviewed it, and don’t have an opinion. All I know is what I read: this, this, this, this, and this.
Please add other links in the comments.
EDITED TO ADD (1/24): Also this.
Clive Robinson • January 23, 2013 1:33 PM
Reading between the lines I would say that the encryption is not there for the security of the data or it’s owners, it’s only their to stop the site owner getting prosecuted.
As I understand it the site owner is currently facing extradition proceadings to the U.S. on what are essentialy charges relating to the copying and distrubution of copyright protected material.
The site owners argument appears to be, if the site owner cannot tell if the files contain copyright protected material then he cannot be held liable.
I suspect he will find that he has misjudged our legal brethren. As far as I can tell unless he gets acknowledged “common carrier” statuss then copyright holders can still go after him for civil damages as a minimum.
Also he may also be iin breach of his bail conditions currently, so he could have already sailed to close to the wind as it where.