Cyberwar is Overhyped
A new report from the OECD says the threat of cyberwar has been grossly exaggerated. (Hey, that’s what I said.)
There are lots of news articles.
Also worth reading is this article on cyberwar hype and how it isn’t serving our national interests, with some good policy guidelines.
fbm • January 21, 2011 12:40 PM
The thing with cyberwarfare and its “threats” is the same as airline/airport security – you can never pinpoint what the next attack will be. The best bet is to play it safe, use RAMP measures, and keep vigilant watch on assets.
But the US is too caught up in imagining threats to realize that the real threat is not being prepared for basic ones – like someone with a knife on the plane or someone getting a pistol through the metal detectors at the airport.
On the Stuxnet front – Americans are highly unlikely (in the unlikely event that proof is presented we were involved in its inception) to perceive that attack on Iran’s nuclear facility as cyberwarfare. Why? Because we came up with it and did it and it’s ok because we’re good now.
I think the perception of cyberwarfare is so wild and full of fantasy because there’s never really been an imminent, perceivable, or defendable threat. Unlike an invasion or someone dropping a bomb.