Interview with TSA Administrator John Pistole
He’s more realistic than one normally hears:
So if they get through all those defenses, they get to Reagan [National Airport] over here, and they’ve got an underwear bomb, they got a body cavity bomb—what’s reasonable to expect TSA to do? Hopefully our behavior detection people will see somebody sweating, or they’re dancing on their shoes or something, or they’re fiddling with something. Our explosives specialists, they’ll do something – they do hand swabs at random, unpredictably. If that doesn’t work then they go through (the enhanced scanner). And these machines give the best opportunity to detect a non-metallic device, but they’re not foolproof.
[…]
We’re not in the risk elimination business. The only way you can eliminate car accidents from happening is by not driving. OK, that’s not acceptable. The only way you can eliminate the risk of planes blowing up is nobody flies.
He still ducks some of the hard questions.
I am reminded my own interview from 2007 with then-TSA Administrator Kip Hawley.
Brandioch Conner • December 22, 2010 12:56 PM
From the article:
“If they are nuns. That’s the question. So how do we verify who that person is?”
And then …
“So, starting with pilots. Pilots were the biggest group of those I assessed as being low risk to civil aviation. I mean come on, they’re in charge of the yoke, they can put the plane down, like the co-pilot in Egypt Air in 990 did.”
#1. How do you verify that they really ARE pilots?
#2. What is there to stop even a real pilot from transporting explosives that will be given to a different person on a different flight?