When Voting Machine Audit Logs Don't Help
Wow:
Computer audit logs showing what occurred on a vote tabulation system that lost ballots in the November election are raising more questions not only about how the votes were lost, but also about the general reliability of voting system audit logs to record what occurs during an election and to ensure the integrity of results.
The logs, which Threat Level obtained through a public records request from Humboldt County, California, are produced by the Global Election Management System, the tabulation software, also known as GEMS, that counts the votes cast on all voting machines—touch-screen and optical-scan machines—made by Premier Election Solutions (formerly called Diebold Election Systems).
The article gets pretty technical, but is worth reading.
Clive Robinson • January 23, 2009 8:19 AM
And the upshot is software that is,
1, Poor software specification
2, Badley written
3, Not audited correctly
4, Has complex and mainly usless update security.
5, The company says that it’s all fixed in revision x.y.z.a.16, but due to 4 above most machiens are many revisions behind.
Oh and the hardware can be easily opened and fairly quickly tampered with…