"Family Guy" on Airport Security

Funny clip.

EDITED TO ADD (1/8): Amazingly enough, this was aired before 9/11. I think it makes better satire now.

Posted on January 8, 2007 at 12:34 PM • 31 Comments


Josh OJanuary 8, 2007 1:15 PM

Here come the PC Attack Dogs again Bruce. Are you doing this on purpose? I hope so.

SteightonJanuary 8, 2007 1:36 PM

There are days when The Family Guy really hits home with it's satire (then there are the days when it's just another Frank Sinatra parody)... This was a good one, thanks Bruce.

nashJanuary 8, 2007 1:36 PM

Realize that this was animated / aired BEFORE 9/11. And it was removed from the dvd release since the dvd was released after 9/11.

nashJanuary 8, 2007 1:37 PM

Realize that this was animated / aired BEFORE 9/11. And it was removed from the dvd release since it was released after 9/11.

UnAnonymousJanuary 8, 2007 2:38 PM

Lol! Hilarious sequence of comments. Can we have some support for people having disorders here...

Bruce SchneierJanuary 8, 2007 2:53 PM

"Realize that this was animated / aired BEFORE 9/11. And it was removed from the dvd release since the dvd was released after 9/11."

I did not.

How odd; it's better satire after 9/11.

AnonymooseJanuary 8, 2007 2:57 PM

Conspiracy theory #699: The writers/producers of The Family Guy, in collusion with FoxNews were involved in the planning of 9/11...

barryJanuary 8, 2007 7:12 PM

Not only was this before 9/11, but Seth MacFarlane (creator of this series) was actually scheduled to be on one of the flights that went into the twin towers on 9/11. He was apparently hungover from the night before and missed the flight by 10 minutes.

By putting these two facts together and it becomes obvious that the RAND corporation must of been involved. The involvement of the saucer people is not so clear; they aren't such a big fan of show tunes after all.

More info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seth_MacFarlane#September_11.2C_2001_experience

JVJanuary 8, 2007 9:56 PM

Would you believe if I told you some stupid judge has ordered all backbones to block access to youtube yesterday in Brazil? He acted because of an action from a celebrity caught having sex on the beach. Since the videos keep comming faster than youtube can take them out, he decided to shut the whole thing down. Hopefully this will be overrulled by the weekend.

DoomguyJanuary 9, 2007 3:32 AM

Regarding the brazillian ban on youtube, it's funny that Youtube's owner, Google, still has the video up on Google Video :-)

gregJanuary 9, 2007 4:15 AM

Yes its funny. Its also accurate. There is a very real human factor in "screening".

Matthew X. EconomouJanuary 9, 2007 8:40 AM

Yo TorUser, this is Bruce's personal blog. He's completely entitled to however much mindless link propagation he likes. I mean, for God's sake, the man links to pictures of SQUID every Friday! And you're complaining about a Family Guy clip? ;)

AnotherToruserJanuary 9, 2007 10:02 AM

@JV. It makes sense if you view it through the lens of Brazilian law. There exists the law that people have a right to control all aspects of their image. It implies that you are in control of all your personal information. This may be an extreme case, but really is within the maze of Brazillian laws.

markmJanuary 9, 2007 10:44 AM

Whatever the Brazilian law is, this court order is going to be as effective as the order King Canute gave to the sea.

trnJanuary 9, 2007 1:59 PM

Why can't we have threaded comments ubiquitous on blogs?? It might make them readable.

ScarybugJanuary 9, 2007 4:58 PM

The show is just "Family Guy", not "The Family Guy".

I know this because I made the mistake of calling it the former on a forum once and I got kicked out of the intertubes.

Leave a comment

Allowed HTML: <a href="URL"> • <em> <cite> <i> • <strong> <b> • <sub> <sup> • <ul> <ol> <li> • <blockquote> <pre>

Photo of Bruce Schneier by Per Ervland.

Schneier on Security is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of IBM Resilient.