Bruce Schneier | |||||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « National Cybersecurity Awareness Month | Main | Insider Attack Against Diebold Voting Machines » October 4, 2011Security CartoonNice cartoon on the problems of content filtering. Posted on October 4, 2011 at 1:29 PM • 13 Comments To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. kingsnake • October 4, 2011 1:45 PM Apparently Bruce's link has slashdotted their server. ;-p ----- The connection has timed out The server at onefte.com is taking too long to respond. Andrew • October 4, 2011 1:52 PM Transcript from Google Cache:
B-Con • October 4, 2011 2:05 PM Two Dilbert strips on content filtering: http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/1996-01-24/ Captain Obvious • October 4, 2011 3:03 PM @kingsnake You've stumbled on part of Bruce's plan for world domination. 1. Post link to competitor's website on blog I never really understood the knee-jerk, emphasis on the jerk part, reaction to inappropriate content. Then I saw this: http://penny-arcade.com/comic/2011/08/15 Standard warning: Penny-Arcade, while highly accurate and extremely humorous, is rarely work safe. This is not an exception to that rule. You might also appreciate: NobodySpecial • October 5, 2011 11:53 AM If you are introducing a Bill discussing internet censorship it's a good idea to disable your own email filtering software while discussing it! Terry Cloth • October 9, 2011 4:05 PM My wife is organizing a fundraiser to support healthcare for women's cancer issues. She couldn't figure out why some folks weren't responding to her e-mails.... (Hint: ``breast cancer'' includes the word ``breast''. Can't have that! :-/) Mbourgon • October 29, 2011 8:07 PM Terry - years and years ago, either Prodigy or AOL had a similar problem. I seem to remember a hubbub due to the "hooter cancer" discussion group.
Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type. Photo at top by Geoffrey Stone.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments