Bruce Schneier | |||||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « Anti-Missile Technology on Commercial Aircraft | Main | Friday Squid Blogging: National Geographic Giant Squid Photo » January 18, 2008Another Schneier InterviewPosted on January 18, 2008 at 2:53 PM • 3 Comments To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. Tristam29 • January 19, 2008 11:50 AM In the interview you say that regulation sells more security products and services, but you imply this is because fear and greed don't work as motivators for security. This seems like a non sequitur since complying with the law is a fear-based rationalization: the fear of prosecution or even the fear of an expensive lawsuit is the underlying motivation. I agree with you that regulation sells more security products and services, but I think it has more to do with the fact that regulation ends up creating a (perhaps ad hoc) set of metrics that can be used to somewhat objectively measure the end result in a language that business people understand: the law. Sedgequill • January 19, 2008 7:29 PM Will liability ever settle upon operating systems with security failings that result in actual damages, I wonder, or will the conditions of customer agreements always preclude that possibility?
Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type. Photo at top by Geoffrey Stone.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments