Richard Clarke on the "Puppy Dog" Theory of Terrorism
Excellent op ed, by someone who actually knows about this stuff:
How is this odd terrorist puppy dog behavior supposed to work? The President must believe that terrorists are playing by some odd rules of chivalry. Would this be the “only one slaughter ground at a time” rule of terrorism?
Of course, nothing about our being “over there” in any way prevents terrorists from coming here. Quite the opposite, the evidence is overwhelming that our presence provides motivation for people throughout the Arab world to become anti-American terrorists.
Some 100,000 Iraqis, probably more, have been killed since our invasion. They have parents, children, cousins and fellow tribal clan members who have pledged revenge no matter how long it takes. For many, that revenge is focused on America.
Albatross • April 27, 2007 12:28 PM
We need to pay attention to words. The “War on Terror” is a misnomer, since it is impossible to conduct war on a tactic. Remove the label and it becomes easier to ask what the “War on Terror” is supposed to be: an increased awareness of small-group guerilla tactics against Western nations?; a blanket justification for unilateral military actions agains state and non-state organizations?; a program to divert national treasure into a highly-privatized foreign actions and hence into the pockets of those promoting those actions? All of the above?
Likewise the “War in Iraq” is not a war. It stopped being a war four years ago Tuesday. It is an occupation. Referring to it properly as “the Occupation of Iraq” makes it much easier to deal with. For example, does one “win” an occupation? No, one “ends” an occupation. Can one “lose” an occupation? Yes, possibly: but ending and occupation is not the same as losing an occupation any more than leaving a house is the same as being kicked out of a house.
It’s really high time that we start challenging these mislabeled actions in order to better understand and address them. Calling these things ‘wars’ lends them a moral weight far out of proportion to what is justified, and opens the door for exploitation and abuses like those we’ve already seen.