Bruce Schneier | |||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « Counterfeit Electronics as a Terrorist Tool | Main | Winkler on NSA Spying » May 24, 2006Movie Clip Mistaken for Al Qaeda VideoOops: Reuters quoted a Pentagon official, Dan Devlin, as saying, "What we have seen is that any video game that comes out... (al Qaeda will) modify it and change the game for their needs." Posted on May 24, 2006 at 2:14 PM • 20 Comments • View Blog Reactions To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. Well that sucks...when all my BF2 buddys heard there was an Al Qeada Mod for BF2 they all asked the same thing, "Is it any good?" Finding out it is all fake... dang. Posted by: AG at May 24, 2006 3:08 PM They missed the best part: "I was just a boy when the infidels came to my village in their Blackhawk helicopters. The infidels fired at the oilfields and they lit up like the eyes of Allah. Burning oil rained down from the sky and cooked everything it touched. I could only hide myself and cry as my goats were consumed by the fire of black liquid death." Posted by: mary at May 24, 2006 3:23 PM I guess ESRB will have to re-rate BF2 to "A" for "al Quaeda". Posted by: derf at May 24, 2006 3:42 PM Yes, it was just a mistake. Oops. Too bad the game developers and script writers have already been moved to Guantanamo and tortured without representation or trial. I'm sure the government will release them eventually, as soon as we are sure they aren't terrorists... Posted by: Joseph at May 24, 2006 4:04 PM @Joseph If they ever get released, they'd better know Albanian! ;-) We laugh because if we don't, we cry. My kids won't believe me when I tell them how great freedom was. Posted by: ac at May 24, 2006 5:28 PM @ac At the rate things are going, you'll be lucky if your kids don't *have you arrested* for "telling them how great freedom was". Posted by: karl at May 24, 2006 8:58 PM Don't tell them that sniper rifles are very popular in BF2 and other FPS games, it'll just make them even more worried. This is the DaVinci Code problem - good people will somehow turn into anti-Christian fanatics because they read a mystery novel, or that a two-and-a-half hour film is sufficient to convert someone into an adherent of a specific Gnostic text. By these lights, I should be volunteering for futuristic bloodsports sponsored by the Liandri Corporation. Where's my flak cannon? Posted by: Nick Lancaster at May 24, 2006 10:12 PM Well, more politicians, as usual mostly Republicans, using "terrorists" to push their own unrelated agenda. Are we surprised? Posted by: Michael at May 25, 2006 12:56 AM Heh. I wonder if the government will allow, in a couple of years, Halliburton to spinoff a corporation named Liandri, to solve the unlawful enemy combatant problem and the pourous border problem in one fell swoop. Soccer stadia worldwide will shake in the awe and wonder that is: "Unreasonable search and Tournament: Gitmo of the Year Edition" Posted by: Gil at May 25, 2006 1:36 AM You just could not make this sort of thing up... Which reminds me Bruce how are the Movi-Plots comming along, and are you going to read one out next time you have to appear before a Gov enquiry? Posted by: Clive Robinson at May 25, 2006 7:38 AM That just one more proof that the US government is totally insanne! Posted by: Vive le Québec at May 25, 2006 7:50 AM I still think an Al Qaeda Mod would be interesting... always good to get into the head of the enemy Posted by: AG at May 25, 2006 11:45 AM I don't think a mod for this game (an online multi-player shooter, if I'm not mistaken) will give us a great deal of insight into how terrorists operate. Posted by: Benny at May 25, 2006 1:50 PM Nope. A mod for BF2 wouldn't make you an expert on terrorism any more than playing SOCOM 2 makes you a Navy SEAL. These guys have been watching too many late-night repeats of 'Red Dawn' and 'Invasion USA'. Posted by: Nick Lancaster at May 25, 2006 3:07 PM Reminds me of that old debate about the video game called Custer's Revenge (later called Westward Ho). I heard reports of this actually making it to an arcade version and being installed in bars around the midwest. Could be urban legend, but Nintendo apparently tried to prevent this kind of game from spreading by introducing an authentication chip requirement (alas, which was circumvented by several simple methods). Wikipedia has a good summary of the game and why it was so controversial: Gee, look how far we've come in terms of gaming the gaming systems. Posted by: Davi Ottenheimer at May 25, 2006 5:18 PM That reminds me of this 2004 story in U.S. News and World Reports: "It was the lead item on the government's daily threat matrix one day last April. Don Emilio Fulci described by an FBI tipster as a reclusive but evil millionaire, had formed a terrorist group that was planning chemical attacks against London and Washington, D.C. That day even FBI director Robert Mueller was briefed on the Fulci matter. But as the day went on without incident, a White House staffer had a brainstorm: He Googled Fulci. His findings: Fulci is the crime boss in the popular video game Headhunter. 'Stand down,' came the order from embarrassed national security types." http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/whispers/articles/040517/17whisplead_2.htm Posted by: Mike at May 26, 2006 11:30 PM I found the coverage of this issue from Gonzalo Frasca of watercoolergames very insightful. "May 12, 2006: Transcripts from the "fake terrorist videogame" Hearings now available" and most recently how Reuters kinda sorta backpedaled on their misreporting 3 weeks ago: Posted by: g. at May 28, 2006 1:32 PM Reds Under the Bed!? This is an example of what happens when a country's well-oiled propoganda machine is running out of control. Even those who should know better than making ad-hoc attempts at spotting terrorists fall prey to the machine. What we're experiencing here is the fallout from being in a 'War on Terror.' Think about this; There's a psychological vacuum when fighting an unknown, unseen enemy, who may be your neighbor, who could strike at any time, who 'hates our way of life.' Anybody and everybody clings to any skerrick of tangible evidence of the enemy. In a war against the wind, a swaying tree is not the enemy, nor is a ceiling fan. If you want to go to war on the wind, you have to know about what produces and sustains it, where it comes from, where it's likely to blow. We haven't seen any government come out with a study into why 'they' hate us, why 'they' hate our way of life, or even what 'they' really want to achieve by terrorising us. Never mind the spin, Devlin has fallen prey to the same fears we all have, and clutched tightly to an empty hope, thinking that he'd found a tangible proof to justify an intangeble war. Until western governments start out on a search for the reasons behind terrorism, we'll all be sucked into the psychological vacuum Devlin finds himself in, and it won't stop, and it will never go away. Posted by: Kendal at May 28, 2006 10:38 PM DIS IS SO STUPID DA ONLY SOLUTION IS 2 KILL ALL TERORISTS Posted by: Anonymous at September 19, 2006 1:13 AM Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type 3.36. Photo at top by Steve Woit.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments