Bruce Schneier | |||||||||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « Sniffing Passwords is Easy | Main | Fraudulent Stock Transactions » November 10, 2005Military Uses for Silly StringI'm a former Marine I in Afghanistan. Silly string has served me well in Combat especially in looking for IADs, simply put, booby traps. When you spray the silly string in dark areas, especially when you doing house to house fighting. On many occasions the silly string has saved me and my men's lives. And: When you spray the string it just spreads everywhere and when it sets it lays right on the wire. Even in a dark room the string stands out revealing the trip wire. Posted on November 10, 2005 at 7:59 AM • 45 Comments To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. I've heard they've come up with uses for fake ice cubes with spiders inside too Posted by: Dan at November 10, 2005 8:24 AM @Dan Do tell...? I can't believe they are pulling pranks on the insurgents? :) Dan Linder Posted by: Dan Linder at November 10, 2005 8:43 AM You'll forgive me Bruce, but this one sounds like the kind of thing I'd expect to find debunked in Snopes. Posted by: Anonymous at November 10, 2005 8:54 AM The ingenuity of the American soldier is amazing. One of the biggest reasons for our military successes throughout history has been the ability to improvise and overcome. Silly string use to save lives is a perfect example. Posted by: Lee at November 10, 2005 8:57 AM @Dan: Military uses for fake ice cubes with spiders inside: Psychowar. Spread the rumour that when the ice melts the REALLY VISCIOUS poisonous spider comes out of suspended animation and is HUNGRY. Then toss a few cubes into suspicious rooms and see psyched- out people come running out of the room. Posted by: Stu Savory at November 10, 2005 9:14 AM if I can make a deadly weapon out of a pencil (or hurt someone with a credit card) silly string can definitely be put to good use. What I'm curious about is - what WERE they doing with it in their packs in the first place, out on the field... Posted by: Kage at November 10, 2005 9:23 AM Sounds ingenious, sure. But isn't it IED, not IAD? Posted by: James Walker at November 10, 2005 10:00 AM "You'll forgive me Bruce, but this one sounds like the kind of thing I'd expect to find debunked in Snopes." Has it been? Posted by: Bruce Schneier at November 10, 2005 10:00 AM "What I'm curious about is - what WERE they doing with it in their packs in the first place, out on the field..." Sure, they are military men, but they are still, by and large, teenagers and very young adults. A few pranks, some silly string "exercises", sound like a wonderful way to blow off some of the incredible pressures they encounter. And whether or not it gets debunked, it sounds like it would work. If they aren't using it yet, I bet they will now. Thanks, Bruce. Posted by: Probitas at November 10, 2005 10:17 AM Let's just hope they aren't using the flammable type of silly string! Posted by: Israel Torres at November 10, 2005 10:21 AM @Bruce: This is OT, but check out Via that blog post, we learn that Ahmed Chalabi is a University of Chicago mathematics wiz who is capable of breaking US and Iranian cryptography: "Hitchens then turned the subject back to Chalabi, his good friend. I asked him if he thought Chalabi had been passing American intelligence to the Iranians. 'No,' he insisted. 'It's possible that with his training, you know, at [The University of] Chicago that with his own ability he was able to crack the codes. He is a mathematical genius. His expertise is cryptology. It is possible that he broke the codes himself.'" Posted by: Chris Walsh at November 10, 2005 10:25 AM Maybe. Tripwires can be damned sensitive. Something that light might work. I have to teach a class in January on IED, so I'll arrange to have some put together, and see what the string does. I'll try to remember to send the results to Bruce. TK Posted by: Terry Karney at November 10, 2005 11:47 AM Someone set us up the bomb. Send every silly string for great justice. Posted by: jammit at November 10, 2005 12:33 PM IAD=Improvised Anti-personnel Device? Most likely a typo. Posted by: jammit at November 10, 2005 12:34 PM I remember a British television program from several years ago (1990's sometime) which was obviously aimed at glorifying the British armed forces. Squads of four or five men from various regiments were picked to go through some set exercises. The tasks included forced marches, carrying an "injured" person crossing obstacles like ravines and so on.... sort of a military survivor. The one task that sticks in my mind was "clearing a mine field" or something similar. The Ghurka team started out by spraying silly string over the area to show up any tripwires and it was very effective. The silly string hung on the tripwire and showed where it was, but was light enough not to pull on it. Given that this was a "trick" used by this team over ten years ago, I am not surprised to hear that other people are using the same technique now. The British armed forces have learned a lot about IED from their time in Northern Ireland. Z. Posted by: Zwack at November 10, 2005 1:22 PM "IAD=Improvised Anti-personnel Device? Most likely a typo." Take your pick: Posted by: Mike at November 10, 2005 2:18 PM It might be fun to spray that thing around but probably less fun to clean it off. Posted by: Ari Heikkinen at November 10, 2005 3:28 PM From my (limited) training with IED and explosives while in the armed forces it sounds like it could work. However, it also sounds like something no sane armed force would recommend the soldiers to do. IED, especially those made by unskilled enemies, can be extremely sensitive. You learn to, if possible, not even walk heavily nearby as vibrations might set them off. Even if the string might be light, touching the trigger of such a device is not a safe bet under any circumstances. Another problem is that people unskilled with explosives tend to err on the side of caution when it comes to the amount of explosives they use in the trap. Which means, they use so much that they are sure they blow up the enemy. I don’t know about Iraq or Afghanistan, but I remember reading that the average booby trap (not made of hand grenades) found in Vietnam was 10 kg of explosives, with some extreme cases containing several tons. Often they were build out of artillery shells, and I doubt you can “shoot��? that string long enough to survive a 155mm shell going off. The combination means that anybody using such a trick to find booby-traps is most likely placing himself and his group in a grave danger (as if a war wasn’t dangerous enough). The old tricks (a lamp, attention and carefulness) are probably less likely to get you blown to bits. Posted by: Student at November 10, 2005 3:48 PM Sounds like a great idea to me if it works. Cheap, light, and effective. Maybe the manufacturers are actually pushing it on soldiers in order to find a new market overseas, since Silly String is apparently being banned domestically: http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20051031/... "In the second year of the crackdown, red and white 'Silly String Prohibited' signs have gone up along Hollywood Boulevard, spelling out the law and warning of a $1,000 fine for violators. Some passers-by have looked at them with confusion. [...] Across the country, from the Boston suburbs to Tacoma, Wash., the party favorite-menace has been banned, like beach balls have been, at graduation ceremonies, parades and festivals." Posted by: Davi Ottenheimer at November 10, 2005 4:08 PM @Student: "However, it also sounds like something no sane armed force would recommend the soldiers to do." Generally it may not be a good idea, but if you have to go into the building and can't wait for a demo team to secure it, it may be a life-saver. Then again, it may also alert anyone inside of your presence outside the door. Posted by: Jarrod at November 10, 2005 4:28 PM Cockeyed is a very amusing site. Among other things, on the page While one could, in principle, make a tripwire so sensitive that it was set off by SS, it would also be set off by flies landing on it, trucks driving past a considerable distance away, and probably even the vibrations from the operator's own footsteps as he backed away after setting it. In short, an IED with a tripwire so sensitive it was set off by SS would also be very unlikely to kill anyone except the fool who set it up, and maybe some hapless insects. Most actual real world tripwire operated fuzes have a fixed (but imprecise) operating tension which is somewhere between 1 and 2 kg-force. For example the US M16A1 requires a pull of about 1.5 kgf, while the Russian POMZ (which has been widely copied, and has a fuze also commonly used in IED) requires about 1 kg. [1] I think this is a good idea, and I like it. I see just two issues: As a small aside, one of the issues when clearing a complex area of IED is clearly indicating which areas have and have not been cleared. IF you only do the SS last, then presence of SS (but no mine marker!) => checked! Finally it occurs to me that spraying an area with a particular colour of SS might make a cheap temporary way of ensuring that no-one has entered, which can be useful when, for example, searching a place and you don't have enough people to guard every room you've checked already. If the SS over the door is intact, then it's unlikely anyone has re-entered. Of course this would only be useful for a few minutes. Posted by: Roger at November 10, 2005 8:48 PM presumably, now that silly string is an official part of the military arsenal three things will happen: Posted by: dave at November 11, 2005 3:08 AM @dave It's military, so it has to be green! "3. The price will increase from £1.00 a can to £500 a can" If NASA wants to use it too the price will go up to $10,000 a can. Posted by: Kees Huyser at November 11, 2005 9:39 AM Sent this article to my nephew, who is a team leader for an Army EOD unit. He says it's an old technique and he's been carrying a can of silly string on his vest for years. Posted by: Mark J. at November 12, 2005 10:03 AM FWIW, Snopes has, as of yet, no mention at all of SS. Posted by: David Frier at November 12, 2005 3:24 PM Imagine if you were a terrorist hiding in the back, waiting with an AK-47 for US soldiers to come in, what you would think when instead silly string came flying into the room. Posted by: anonymous at November 12, 2005 7:32 PM There's considerable discussion here about what kind of tripwires and how much explosives are in an IED and how IAD was a typo. But the article didn't mention explosives, just booby-traps. If they're inspecting homes for terrorists they're more likely to run into home-brew booby-traps than explosives. It's pretty easy to rig a lethal booby trap with stuff you'd find around most homes. Why buy and deal with the logistics of C-4 when a bottle of ammonia and beach or an ironing board nailed to the ceiling and spring-loaded with the kitchen knives will do? Posted by: Bill McGonigle at November 13, 2005 4:36 PM Here is a reply from a friend who is a Marine. Posted by: Anonymous at November 14, 2005 6:11 PM For whatever reason... this article has been "modified by request" - it now reads simply, "It stops tanks." Go to Google's cache to read the original: http://64.233.167.104/search?... Posted by: Gordon Schumacher at November 16, 2005 2:48 PM All this discussion about whether the military uses silly string or not. Who do you think invented it? The original mix came in 16oz cans and was called "wire detector" There were no party colors, it was all white for best visibility in all light conditions. Originally developed in Korea for detecting trip wired in mine fields it had limited use in Vietnam where humidity kept it from sticking to anything. Not carried by most US forces, they can only carry so much and the supply is limited, it is usually used by units dedicated to clearing mines and IEDs. Posted by: Anonymous at December 13, 2005 11:50 AM I SALE THIS PROD. ELI Posted by: ELI COVE at December 11, 2006 2:47 PM what about putting pigs blood on bullets Posted by: Anonymous at December 13, 2006 10:32 AM Duh, it works. Florescent + night vision = easily detectable wires.. think about it... Posted by: Homer at January 17, 2007 11:16 AM I'm a mom in Ga that's just concern about helping our troops who do I contact as far as sending the silly string to ? my e-mail is janetgreenedaniels@yahoo.com Posted by: JANET DANIELS at January 23, 2007 7:08 AM hello, thank you, Posted by: Anthony Luciani at January 25, 2007 6:21 PM our elementry school collected over 300 cans of silly string...a woman from new jersery has a son over in iraq..she was on good morning america and said what her son asked her for was silly string..so she started collecting it..the last i had heard she has over 2000 cans and climbing..so the myth about the silly string is true..our soliders use other everyday items as well when in the field..the place condoms over the barrel of their gun so sand wont get in it..they use women feminine products to pack wound.. Posted by: diane at February 1, 2007 5:00 PM I chair Missions Committee at my church. We are interested in sending Silly String cans to whoever can ship them to Iraq. Pls. send info asap as we have a meeting in two weeks. Thank You Posted by: Jo-an at February 18, 2007 3:43 PM My husband is a MP in the D.C. Army National Guard. His unit is being sent over to Iraq in May. I am very interested in collecting silly string. I am curious about who I can contact about sending the string over to Iraq. Please contact me at cspalding78@hotmail.com. Thank you. Posted by: Christina at February 24, 2007 5:19 PM there should be a different type of silly string for the military. i got caught and suspended for 3 months todai for possesion of silly string. because of its use im basically carrying a "weapon" and since i sprayed it i had and used a weapon in school. Posted by: kevin at March 6, 2007 8:57 PM i love you americans :) you all love your war dont you. :) Posted by: binny at April 5, 2007 6:32 PM I think the manufacturer should make a standardised military can of silly string with a camo shell and then a flourescing string so it is even more visible in dark places or at night. I've tried to contact a manufacturer to suggest this, but I can't seem to find one. Maybe a standard military issued of silly string(more like serious string now) will save more lives. At least the camo shell wouldn't be as visible on their person when they carry it. Posted by: Joelle at April 26, 2007 12:32 PM You can't send it by airmail because it's an areosol can. Maybe the army/airforce could help you though. Posted by: NoNo at September 24, 2007 7:04 AM 4500 people died from diarrhea yesterday (and every day), and we turn out in droves for silly string. Posted by: travis at April 1, 2008 4:53 AM Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type. Photo at top by Steve Woit.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments