Bruce Schneier | |||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « The Kutztown 13 | Main | RFID in British License Plates » August 22, 2005Bluetooth As a Laptop SensorThieves are using Bluetooth phones to find Bluetooth-enabled laptops in parked cars, which they then steal. Nice example of unintended security consequences of a new technology. And more evidence that new features need to be turned off by default. Posted on August 22, 2005 at 1:20 PM • 37 Comments • View Blog Reactions To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. This is, however, another argument against badly-implemented RFID tags on passports. (Yes, the argument has been made, but actual vs. theoretical is always helpful.) Posted by: Daedala at August 22, 2005 1:41 PM Is a bluetooth laptop detectable in this way when it's asleep? Posted by: gb at August 22, 2005 2:04 PM So these people leave their notebook on, when they go away? Then the workaround would seem quite simple. (Or does the phone sense the notebook's bluetooth even when notebook is turned off?) Posted by: pit at August 22, 2005 2:08 PM Yes, as far as I know, Bluetooth-enabled laptops are always on, even if they are asleep. When they receive a signal, they wake up to acknowledge it. Correct me if I am wrong. Posted by: crash2snow at August 22, 2005 2:28 PM Surely you can disable wake on bluetooth (WOB?) in the same way you can disable wake on LAN. @Bruce, ``turning off by default" eliminates the benefits of technology... Posted by: Ben Smyth at August 22, 2005 2:31 PM @Ben Smyth: Posted by: Tom Chiverton at August 22, 2005 2:42 PM I remember hearing this as a big problem at Disneyland somewhere (primary theft from their huge parking structure), but I can't find the source. Posted by: Nicholas Weaver at August 22, 2005 2:42 PM @Ben Smyth Not really. The operative idea is that lot of times people do not know what technology they have on, and aren't using it. So, there is no benefit to be seen if you aren't using it in the first place. No benefit, and all the downfalls of it -- not a good situation to be in, is it? Posted by: Tim Vail at August 22, 2005 3:10 PM @Tom & Tim, Having bluetooth enabled on my PC and mobile allows my phone to be backed up without the need to do anything. If I had to enable bluetooth everytime I wanted to do a backup, I would end up not bothering, it would require too much hassle. My point is, it should be possible for bluetooth to be enabled (and secure) at all times. Posted by: Ben Smyth at August 22, 2005 3:30 PM This was my first crit of bluetooth... Too open. But then thats the idea, that they can "all" [any bluetooth thingy] connect. If you care about the data on the laptop, i would be not be using wireless, and not windows, where you are at the whim of the vendors drivers. Or i would have a convenance laptop with nothing to sensitive on it and have any wireless tech i felt like using. Of course i have left out theft.....Well, i would not leave the laptop in the car. Greg Posted by: Greg at August 22, 2005 3:46 PM Ben Smyth: Perhaps it should be possible for bluetooth to be enabled at all times, but you should have to explicitly request this. (This can be a one-time operation; you don't need to repeat the request every time you use the feature.) It definitely shouldn't be running "out of the box," when the user hasn't requested it and might not even be aware it exists. (Just like my computer has an SSH server always running, but I had to specifically enable this when I first set it up.) Posted by: Matt Brubeck at August 22, 2005 4:29 PM Sounds like this technique only works because the laptops can be distinguished by their Bluetooth signal. If Bluetooth becomes more ubiquitous, it will be harder to tell a laptop from, say, a cell phone, or PDA, or even the vehicle console itself. Maybe car alarms should include false Bluetooth signals as "bait". I've heard of "bait" cars being set out by police to catch thieves, these vehicles should include Bluetooth signals. Would it be possible, or practical, just to have Bluetooth signaling devices - perhaps with intermittent signals - embedded in all the parking spaces? Posted by: Francois Kashy at August 22, 2005 4:34 PM "Sounds like this technique only works because the laptops can be distinguished by their Bluetooth signal." This makes the point very well. There aren't enough bluetooth devices providing signals. As a result, one can be relatively assured that the presence of a bluetooth signal, and the shorter signal distance, means there is some potentially valuable device is providing that bluetooth signal in close proximity. Posted by: BT at August 22, 2005 5:00 PM so i left the bluetooth laptop on, see, and put it in a shopping bag in the luggage bay under the back seat, then parked in the darkest corner of the structure and walked away. Posted by: another_bruce at August 22, 2005 5:01 PM This is expressly the reason that I refuse to use Bluetooth on any of my systems (and I'm hesitant to use anything wireless), and why when I ordered a laptop for my mother, I strongly recommended not getting Bluetooth. I don't trust the technology, and unlike 802.11, there seems to be little effort being undertaken to improve things. Posted by: Jarrod at August 22, 2005 5:06 PM @Matt, That's a valid point - all the mobile phones I have owned have been like this. You feel (reasonable) secure running SSH, would you feel the same with bluetooth? If not, why not? And why should this even be an issue... Posted by: Ben Smyth at August 22, 2005 5:10 PM This doesn't make sense. Yes, you have found a bluetooth signal.. within 32 feet. Do you break into 4-5 trunks to find the device? Isn't this riskier? More crimes, more chances of getting caught. Or one would think. Posted by: Gil at August 22, 2005 5:20 PM @Gil: Posted by: Francois Kashy at August 22, 2005 5:24 PM The "always-on discoverability" of Bluetooth is said to be going away in the next spec that may be out as early as next year. I have not seen any laptops with this feature, just PDAs and phones. Does anyone know of a laptop that has discoverability? The Sony PCG-TR doesn't seem to have it, but it's listed in the article, no? This sentence made me think that the Police might have just been speculating, since it seems to me that they do not yet have proof of Bluetooth being the mode of detection, just a hunch: "Last month a spate of thefts from cars were put down to thieves using their phones to find laptops after three laptops were stolen from cars parked in neighbouring bays at the Holiday Inn..." Cars in neighboring bays at one hotel parking-lot is not exactly a random sample that demonstrates Bluetooth as the culprit. I mean the police could have also reached the opposite conclusion since the cars were perhaps at an obvious business-traveller location with tight clusters of expensive cars parked overnight with expensive Bluetooth-enabled electronics, such as Audi A6s. I would be more inclined to fault Bluetooth if thieves attacked apparently random cars around a lot where the only thing they had in common was Bluetooth. Posted by: Davi Ottenheimer at August 22, 2005 5:52 PM I have an IBM ThinkPak and it has Bluetooth turned on - when I send it to standby it sleeps well and receives no signals and is not discoverable by other devices (and I could not find a wakeup on bluetooth either, though I might have missed it somewhere. The bluetooth settings have an option (default off AFAIK): I think this story is fishy - bluetooth consumes power - why would people have it on when the machine is asleep? Why would manufacturers make this the default if it noticably reduces the battery time? Posted by: Dror Harari at August 22, 2005 6:28 PM How about a hidden Bluetooth-emitting camera mounted in the trunk that snaps a picture when the trunk is opened. Gotcha. Posted by: Ann Onymous at August 22, 2005 7:06 PM My powerbook (running osx 10.3) can be setup with multiple bluetooth options. It has options to make it discoverable, to wake on bluetooth, to require authentication, etc. I no longer remember the defaults. However, with this set of options, it should be pretty easy to make a laptop invisible to thieves, and yet still useful as intended. Posted by: woody at August 22, 2005 7:39 PM Just checked my laptop (Apple PowerBook) and, while I had been using a bluetooth mouse/keyboard, I haven't used them in some months. I opened my System Prefs to find that my laptop had its "let this computer be discoverable by other bluetooth devices" bit turned on. I have since turned that off as well as the bluetooth itself. This may change if I ever get a BT phone, but for now, I'd rather not be "discovered". Thanks for the note Bruce. Posted by: Bob Monsour at August 22, 2005 9:03 PM The criminals gave me a good idea: a keyring with bluetooth device that would beep and flash leds when it is discovered by another BT device. No more lost keys! Posted by: Jari at August 23, 2005 3:15 AM I was under the impression that "BlueTooth" is merely the technology that facilitates RF comms between any suitable devices. Surely this can be upgraded: 1) Encrypt the data stream so that even if it's intercepted the resulting signal would not be useful. 2) Give laptops the facility to make themselves invisble to blootooth, the same way that phones can. Posted by: DarkFire at August 23, 2005 6:13 AM on a powerbook, bluetooth is listening *during sleep* by default i think, because you can use your bluetooth mouse or keyboard to wake from sleep. Posted by: brian at August 23, 2005 4:18 PM Brian is correct. On my PowerBook, the default Bluetooth settings were "Discoverable" and "Wake-on-Bluetooth" -- the latter so that a Bluetooth keyboard or mouse can wake the computer up after it has gone to sleep. It seems that it might be wise to shut off the Bluetooth functionality of your laptop comptuer, if you intend to leave it unattended in a car for a long period of time. Posted by: Jason Carreiro at August 23, 2005 7:37 PM They were probably just observing people who drive around with their laptops inside the car and then hide them in the car under something or lock them in the trunk when they park. If I know I'm going to have to leave the laptop in the trunk somewhere, I put it there before I arrive. Posted by: MikeG at August 23, 2005 7:58 PM I just tried to scan for my laptop with bluetooth ON and not discoverable. With allow bluetooth devices to wake the computer. I got nothing. Besides, pull the battery out if you are paranoid about this. No battery, no power. No power, no bluetooth. As always there is always a simple solution to this problem. Which I can't replicate at all with my laptop/cell phone. Posted by: MitchT at August 23, 2005 8:30 PM On a simmilar but connected subject - I heard a few months ago that thieves have been using a tool that passively discovers pipes & wires in walls to discover laptops in vehicles. I'm unsure if this is true but apparently the pipe-finder can form some sort of tuned circuit with a bluetooth aerial, thus alerting the thief to the fact that the laptop or mobile phone is in the car. Anyone know if this is even possible? I must say I;'m rather skeptical... Posted by: DarkFire at August 24, 2005 9:05 AM I'm not saying it's not possible, nor that it wouldn't be a good idea to turn bluetooth off on portable gadgets before leaving them unattended. But I've now seen this reported twice (Cambridge & South Manchester). Neither report included any evidence at all apart from police speculation. Occam's razor suggests that thieves are *watching* car parks, or picking likely looking cars. The South Manchester report included the hysterical suggestion that "if you leave a laptop locked in your car in Chorlton, it is likely to get stolen", which probably overestimates the incidence of laptop theft from cars tenthousandfold. A corollary here is with bike theft. 90% of all known bike locks can be picked with a ballpoint pen. This has been widely known to thieves for decades, and widely known to Internet users for a year or so. Do most bike thefts occur this way, despite it being a trivial technique for stealing bikes? No, not in London, anyway. Are laptops secured in offices with insecure Kensington locks routinely stolen? Nope. Posted by: Alison Scott at August 24, 2005 3:04 PM Alison - sounds about right. I'm far more prepared to believe that the average thief is likely to watch for likely targets rather than use a more sophisticated technique... Posted by: DarkFire at August 25, 2005 3:18 AM do they find laptop with some gadget like WiFi Hotspot Finder Wireless Locator seeker? Product Description: Have a labtop? Travel with it? Ever wish you could quickly and easily find a hot spot for wireless internet connections? Whether you are in an airport, another office, coffee shops, bookstores, restaurants or even at home, without having to boot-up your labtop, the Wi-Fi/Hotspot Finder will fine the strongest wireless (802.11 B/G) signal quickly! Product Specification: Detects 802.11B and 802.11G
Posted by: moimeme at November 1, 2005 2:09 PM hi Posted by: Black Smith at April 9, 2007 5:47 AM MACN ELECTRONIC STORE If interested mail us at:mushli10@berlin.com LAPTOPS if interested mail us at:mushli10@berlin.com Posted by: mushli at June 21, 2007 8:00 PM Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type 3.36. Photo at top by Steve Woit.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments