Bruce Schneier | |||||||||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « Hacking a Bicycle Rental System | Main | Keystroke Logging for Profit » February 22, 2005Hunter S. Thompson"Security," by Hunter S. Thompson Posted on February 22, 2005 at 8:00 AM • 13 Comments To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. "Security, by Hunter S. Thompson" --- what about it, Bruce? Posted by: davee at February 22, 2005 8:57 AM I think when he shot himself we all lost something.. In the words of Thompson himself: "I would feel real trapped in life if I didn't know I could commit suicide at any time" Another favourite quote of mine is: "I don't like to advocate alchol, drugs, violence and insanity but they've always worked for me!" Simon. Posted by: Simon Johnson at February 22, 2005 8:58 AM ""Security, by Hunter S. Thompson" --- what about it, Bruce?" Risk. Posted by: Bruce Schneier at February 22, 2005 9:11 AM First Spalding Gray, now Hunter. It must be a heavy burden to be the mad poet for an entire generation. Posted by: Rob Hyndman at February 22, 2005 9:32 AM So is it the man "who has stayed securely on shore and merely existed" who has made life possible for the man "who has braved the storm of life and lived?" Or is it the other way around? What if we all were risk takers? Posted by: Mark Johnson at February 22, 2005 10:51 AM Not directly related to security, but I find this article fascinating. It is by Hunter thompson's son, Called Growing up in Madness Posted by: Gunnar at February 22, 2005 11:20 AM A nice variation on one of my favorite quotes: "A ship is safe in harbor, but that is not what ships are built for." If Hunter were listening, I would tell him we are truly secure when we can take risks and achieve reward. I believe that is the same as what he was trying to say... This might not be totally fair to Hunter, but as much as he detested Nixon and W I do not think he ever criticized them for their carelessness with the law and love of high-stakes risk. They certainly meet his criteria for someone who "shaped the destiny of the world". Posted by: Davi Ottenheimer at February 22, 2005 11:48 AM @Gunnar Perhaps Hunter might have put it another way: "those in control, really aren't, but it takes guts to be honest about one's true relationship with others and lead them without lying". Posted by: Davi Ottenheimer at February 22, 2005 11:55 AM I'll miss Hunter, too. I find it interesting that probably half of the personal (versus corporate) infosec sites I monitor have mentioned his passing. I'll have to hit the archives and see if the same held true for, say, Frank Zappa. Posted by: Chris Walsh at February 22, 2005 1:04 PM >> "Security, by Hunter S. Thompson" --- what about it, Bruce?" > Risk. For whom? Driving while drunk, a glass of whisky in hand; discharging firearms at the houses of people one considers to be _arriviste_ ; beating women. All in all, behaving as a kind of pseudo-French aristocrat. Solipsim is not a pretty ideology. Risk for others. Here is *real* risk-taking within an altruistic context: an army officer taking risks for his men for whom he felt a responsibilty. If this generation were not so corrupt it would feel humility and cry when reading such things, instead of honouring scoundrels like Thompson: "Single-handedly, Cain destroyed three Tiger tanks, standing in the open a few yards from the enemy with an unreliable Piat anti-tank weapon. At one point, he waited until a tank was just 20 yards away from him before opening fire. Although wounded by machine-gun bullets and falling masonry, Major Cain continued to fire, scoring several direct hits until he had immobilised the tank. He was temporarily blinded but after recovering, he led the defence with such ferocity that the Germans were eventually forced to withdraw, allowing Cain's men to escape across the Rhine." Posted by: Damian at February 22, 2005 1:16 PM @Damian Our life is full of risk, we can't cower in fear. But Thompson epitomized reckless irresponsibility. That he killed himself doesn't bother me as much as the thought that he might have killed someone else in a drug or booze inspired stupor. A man in that state simply isn't capable of weighing the risks at hand and making an informed decision. Posted by: Stuart Berman at February 22, 2005 6:55 PM If my math is correct, he must have written this when he was 17. That's astounding! As a writer, I am humbled and humiliated. The man was a genius. It is too bad he's not still here to say it like it is. Posted by: Mana at November 23, 2008 3:21 AM Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type. Photo at top by Steve Woit.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments