Comments
Who? • February 20, 2026 11:39 AM
Can we read something that is not behind a paywall? Thanks.
Clive Robinson • February 20, 2026 2:57 PM
@ Who?, ALL,
“Can we read something that is not behind a paywall?”
Sadly the paywalls are going up faster than the fake-news AI sites. And even site that were not paywalled are fetting paywalls because Advertising is not paying the bills any longer.
But neither link @Bruce gave stopped me getting to the full article when I clicked on them.
However when it does happen to me I’ve found that many paywalled sites allow you to see the report/article title, which you can then,
1, cut and past the title,
2, into DuckDuckGo search engine,
3, to get a link to the full article
On the likes of msn.com news aggregation site.
I hope that helps.
cls • February 20, 2026 10:38 PM
Can we read something that is not behind a paywall?
I’m using Firefox browser extension Bypass Paywalls Clean. You’ll need to download the xpi and install it manually. Look for bpc_temp
Also handy is browser extension Web Archives. Or, copy the URL into any of the archive.is .ph etc sites’ front page.
Browser extension NoScript is effective but clunky for most folks (who aren’t web devs).
ResearcherZero • February 21, 2026 3:48 AM
@Who?
Ghostarchive.org, Megalodon.jp (prefix URL with “gyo.tc”) or the Internet Archive may have the page archived. (Ghostarchive links won’t work if browser is in private/incognito mode.)
The article can be found at the following link for example:
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/FRbYz
If you have uBlock installed you could also use Archive Today. Not having the Ublock extension installed will allow the site to run shady scripts when the site presents a CAPTCHA challenge. The scripts direct DDoS attacks against a blog that commented on the how the archiving operation is run by an anonymous individual perhaps located in Russia.
‘https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-archive-today-after-site-executed-ddos-and-altered-web-captures/
Kent Brockman • February 21, 2026 11:39 AM
“Can we read something that is not behind a paywall?”
It’s easy to read most paywalled articles by just cut & pasting the link to them into a separate browser that has javascript disabled.
Who? • February 21, 2026 4:47 PM
@ Clive Robinson
Thank you! It worked… years ago Google had a cache useful for reading those contents, but it was removed (at least in my country) at the same time news aggregators were blocked.
Who? • February 21, 2026 6:39 PM
@ cls, ResearcherZero, Kent Brockman
Thanks a lot for the tips.
@ cls, I prefer not running browser extensions, except a few ones widely recommended by third parties to improve privacy or reduce fingerprint (usually Privacy Badger, uBlock Origin, and Firefox Multi-account Containers).
@ ResearcherZero, thanks for those references. The Internet Archive has been a required reference to me for decades, very useful when finding something that is not available on-line anymore. I did not know Ghostarchive.org and Megalodon.jp. They look really useful.
It is really interesting what you wrote about Archive Today. Perhaps it earns an entry on this blog! The world is becoming really odd.
@ Kent Brockman
I usually miss this choice… indeed, copying the link into a browser with JavaScript disabled is another option that, surprisingly, works really well to get access to information. It is sad how important has become JavaScript in the last decades. Some time ago, I installed Mosaic on a computer… mostly useless these days, but we certainly need another 300 KB browser again. HTML and CSS should be enough for most sites.
Hope this technique works with Channel 6 news too! 😉
@ ALL
An interesting reading, as it is what is happening right now in the United States with ICE. As noted multiple times on this blog, the problem is not surveillance itself but how it is being [ab]used by authorities or criminals.
Subscribe to comments on this entry
Leave a comment
Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.
Clive Robinson • February 20, 2026 10:41 AM
@ Bruce, ALL,
The thing that still makes me shake my head is that it was well known that Amazon Ring units were spying even those inside peoples houses were in “E.T. Phone Home” mode.
We also knew that Amazon were not just making video and audio available to “guard labour” in states and federally but they were doing “special deals” for Police Officers to “encourage” the take up of Ring devices by ordinary US householders…
Apparently since the “lost dog advert” during the Super bowl, many people have “woken up” and are now demanding and getting full refunds from Amazon.
However there is no news as to if Amazon have deleted stored video and audio data, or if they have sold it on in bulk to Palantir or similar first.
For too many there is now the sense of dread about going out because they feel their every move is being watched and listened on by their neighbours “home security” and they have no right to privacy on the street or other place “over looked” by Ring devices including their own homes.
The fact is courts determine what is and is not permissible not just in US States but in the entire US Federation. And it appears it’s nolonger the cut and dried,
“You have no privacy in public”
As for Flock they were not well known outside of “Number plate reading at car parks” and the like until very recently, but one or two scandals has changed that.
The fact is these “Home and Street” security devices are seen as of great importance to certain states like Texas, who use them across the entire US to track down women seeking “reproductive health care”.
These are States where “rape” is inflicted on the victim by the state due to people that are, lets be honest not exactly near the center line of the mental health distribution curve…
To someone from Europe their attitudes are frankly quite shocking, tyrannical, draconian, and very much unhinged and extremely backward. Even more so to those who understand exactly how “birth control” actually works.
Hopefully the up coming mid-terms will get significantly effected by what has been revealed about Amazon, Flock, and similar surveillance organisations, that causes pushes for change for better privacy legislation in the US.