Comments

LordYarlbleAugust 15, 2012 12:13 AM

That Somini Sengupta fellow is a good writer. I enjoyed the article too, although I may have twitched in recognition of the final sentence. The times in which I currently write could change beyond my best foresight in 20 years. And for all practical purposes it seems fascism is on the menu. I might only add one thing to the article, which is that if you are sincere, fsck it and keep going!

Bob TAugust 15, 2012 8:03 AM

Stewart Baker, who has also written about cryptography, served as the National Security Agency’s chief lawyer, and debated Mr. Schneier on occasion...

It should have said:

Stewart Baker, a soulless government robot...

Don't break the rules. Walk between the lines. Do this, don't do that, can't you read the sign?

AnonAugust 15, 2012 3:57 PM

Some of the comments on those articles really missed the point... One of them degenerated into "zomg Bruce is teh dumb cause $OS is supersecure!!one1" being repeated over and over.

Some people, who think they know security, really seem to not realize that its the steps you take to lock down a system that make it secure, not how it is out of box...

Leave a comment

Allowed HTML: <a href="URL"> • <em> <cite> <i> • <strong> <b> • <sub> <sup> • <ul> <ol> <li> • <blockquote> <pre>

Photo of Bruce Schneier by Per Ervland.

Schneier on Security is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of Co3 Systems, Inc..