The CIA and Assassinations
The former CIA general counsel, John A. Rizzo, talks about his agency's assassination program, which has increased dramatically under the Obama administration:
The hub of activity for the targeted killings is the CIAâs Counterterrorist Center, where lawyers -- there are roughly 10 of them, says Rizzo -- write a cable asserting that an individual poses a grave threat to the United States. The CIA cables are legalistic and carefully argued, often running up to five pages. Michael Scheuer, who used to be in charge of the CIAâs Osama bin Laden unit, describes âa dossier,â or a âtwo-page document,â along with âan appendix with supporting information, if anybody wanted to read all of it.â The dossier, he says, âwould go to the lawyers, and they would decide. They were very picky.â Sometimes, Scheuer says, the hurdles may have been too high. âVery often this caused a missed opportunity. The whole idea that people got shot because someone has a hunchÂI only wish that was true. If it were, there would be a lot more bad guys dead.â
Sometimes, as Rizzo recalls, the evidence against an individual would be thin, and high-level lawyers would tell their subordinates, âYou guys did not make a case.â âSometimes the justification would be that the person was thought to be at a meeting,â Rizzo explains. âIt was too squishy.â The memo would get kicked back downstairs.
The cables that were âready for prime time,â as Rizzo puts it, concluded with the following words: âTherefore we request approval for targeting for lethal operation.â There was a space provided for the signature of the general counsel, along with the word âconcurred.â Rizzo says he saw about one cable each month, and at any given time there were roughly 30 individuals who were targeted. Many of them ended up dead, but not all: âNo. 1 and No. 2 on the hit parade are still out there,â Rizzo says, referring to âyou-know-who and [Ayman al-] Zawahiri,â a top Qaeda leader.
And the ACLU Deputy Legal Director on the interview:
What was most remarkable about the interview, though, was not what Rizzo said but that it was Rizzo who said it. For more than six years until his retirement in December 2009, Rizzo was the CIA's acting general counsel -- the agency's chief lawyer. On his watch the CIA had sought to quash a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by arguing that national security would be harmed irreparably if the CIA were to acknowledge any detail about the targeted killing program, even the program's mere existence.
Rizzo's disclosure was long overdue -- the American public surely has a right to know that the assassination of terrorism suspects is now official government policy Â and reflects an opportunistic approach to allegedly sensitive information that has become the norm for senior government officials. Routinely, officials insist to courts that the nation's security will be compromised if certain facts are revealed but then supply those same facts to trusted reporters.
Posted on April 11, 2011 at 6:33 AM • 85 Comments