Comments
petronius • July 6, 2007 6:49 PM
Yeah, I did too. Because I blogged about it and commented on it here not too long ago. Link: http://petroniusarbiter.blogspot.com/2007/07/freaky-sea-creature-discovered-near.html
asdf • July 6, 2007 8:01 PM
I’m surprised todays article wasn’t the half squid half octopus one on /.
Rob Mayfield • July 6, 2007 8:19 PM
Octosquid is a silly name. Why not Squipus ? Calapus ? etc …
Another link to the Squipus- http://starbulletin.com/2007/07/05/news/story03.html
Nostromo • July 7, 2007 4:32 AM
@Rob Mayfield:
“Octosquid is a silly name. Why not Squipus ?”
Your comment reminds me of a Flanders and Swann song – #3 of “Songs for our time”. The name of the song in an indescribable silly noise. As Flanders put it, “It was originally called, ah, ‘[a different indescribable silly noise]’, but we thought that sounded rather stupid …”
Striped Pyjama Squid • July 7, 2007 5:04 PM
As far as I can tell, the “octosquid” claims are mostly hype. It’s in no way intermediate between octopus and squid; it’s just a squid with no tentacles, which is not unheard of — there are other squid species that don’t have tentacles as adults. Note that they’re talking about it as a possible new species in an existing genus, not a representative of a new family or order.
It’s cool-looking, though.
David Conrad • July 8, 2007 2:23 AM
Crap, I come here to pass on a link to the Octosquid to Bruce, and everyone else already beat me to it? I guess Friday Squid Blogging is pretty popular!
Ben • July 9, 2007 7:25 AM
Making a squid flower is easy: just feed it Miracle-Gro.
Michael Foote • July 12, 2007 11:27 AM
From Australia for your next Friday Squid Blog.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/07/070711-squid-picture.html
Subscribe to comments on this entry
Leave a comment
Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.
Anonymous • July 6, 2007 6:18 PM
I was expecting the Octosquid today.
( http://www.thehawaiichannel.com/news/13630402/detail.html?rss=hon&psp=news )