Comments
Durable Alloy • August 25, 2006 4:31 PM
I have an episode of Winnie The Pooh on VHS, where Gopher claims to be in possession of some U-235.
I kid you not.
antibozo • August 25, 2006 5:44 PM
That’s one cute squid.
Neighborcat • August 25, 2006 5:47 PM
It looks more like the “Charlie Brown Squid” to me… and them’s good eatin’!
Ted Demopoulos • August 25, 2006 9:40 PM
Hot Squid!
Cartoonlike, yet surreal.
Wonder what it tastes like?
Offtopic: some Black Hat presenters lied and claimed they had found big problems in Cisco and Apple products; columnist says it hurts real security by reducing our trust in real flaw reports:
http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyId=17&articleId=9002725
another_bruce • August 27, 2006 12:38 AM
a squid that tastes like baby back ribs would be a major advance.
Administratorte • August 27, 2006 11:45 AM
Oh dear. To the obscure mobile …
In that episode of Winnie the Pooh (that is The New
Adventures of Winnie the Pooh that was shown on
ABC starting in the mid-to-late 80s), Gopher suggests
using U-235 for a specific purpose (that is, to get Rabbit
out of a tree). He never claims to actually have some,
but he seems to like the idea of using it.
I’ll go away now.
Filias Cupio • August 27, 2006 11:11 PM
I’ve normally seen pictures of squid tentacles-down. Have they inverted these pictures to enhance the piglet impersonation (imporconation?) or do these critters really swim that way up?
Andre LePlume • August 28, 2006 10:39 AM
That second one looks like it was shot at an undersea Pink Floyd show.
Lollardfish • August 29, 2006 9:13 AM
But I want to know how they taste!
Durable Alloy • August 29, 2006 2:25 PM
@Administratorte:
Well, it seems that, at the very least, Gopher knows how to use U-235 and has the means to obtain it.
Yes, yes, I’ll go away too…
Subscribe to comments on this entry
Leave a comment
Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.
ac • August 25, 2006 3:59 PM
Not connected with squids but interesting text on airplane security
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/07/09/INGIVJPJR91.DTL