London Rejects Subway Scanners
Rare outbreak of security common sense in London:
London Underground is likely to reject the use of passenger scanners designed to detect weapons or explosives as they are “not practical”, a security chief for the capital’s transport authority said on 14 March 2006.
[…]
“Basically, what we know is that it’s not practical,” he told Government Computing News. “People use the tube for speed and are concerned with journey time. It would just be too time consuming. Secondly, there’s just not enough space to put this kind of equipment in.”
“Finally there’s also the risk that you actually create another target with people queuing up and congregating at the screening points.”
Bryan • March 23, 2006 2:02 PM
I was just reading your airport screening post, but now you give me this, so I’ll just comment on both…
It appears to me that those in charge seem to think bigger locks are what we need. They completely forget the old adage that says “build a better lock, get better criminals”. It seems counterproductive to security to always beef things up when there is little improvement in our actual security levels.
I feel just as safe today at the airport as I did pre-9/11.