The article is a bit inane, but it talks about an interesting security problem. "E-hijacking" is the term used to describe the theft of goods in transit by altering the electronic paperwork:
He pointed to the supposed loss of 3.9-million banking records stored on computer backup tapes that were being shipped by UPS from New York-based Citigroup to an Experian credit bureau in Texas. âThese tapes were not lost â they were stolen," Spoonamore said. âNot only were they stolen, the theft occurred by altering the electronic manifest in transit so it would be delivered right to the thieves." He added that UPS, Citigroup, and Experian spent four days blaming each other for losing the shipment before realizing it had actually been stolen.
Spoonamore, a veteran of the intelligence community, said in his analysis of this e-hijacking, upwards of 15 to 20 people needed to be involved to hack five different computer systems simultaneously to breach the electronic safeguards on the electronic manifest. The manifest was reset from âsecure" to âstandard" while in transit, so it could be delivered without the required three signatures, he said. Afterward the manifest was put back to âsecure"? and three signatures were uploaded into the system to appear as if proper procedures had been followed.
âWhatâs important to remember here is that there is no such thing as âsecurityâ in the data world: all data systems can and will be breached," Spoonamore said. âWhat you can have, however, is data custody so you know at all times who has it, if they are supposed to have it, and what they are doing with it. Custody is what begets data security."
This is interesting. More and more, the physical movement of goods is secondary to the electronic movement of information. Oil being shipped across the Atlantic, for example, can change hands several times while it is in transit. I see a whole lot of new risks along these lines in the future.
Posted on December 9, 2005 at 7:41 AM • 22 Comments