Hurricane Security and Airline Security Collide
Here’s a story (quote is from the second page) where airline security is actually doing harm:
Long lines and chaos snarled evacuees when they tried to catch flights out from two of Houston’s airports. After about 100 federal security screeners failed to report to work Thursday, scores of passengers missed flights and waited for hours at sparsely monitored X-ray machines and luggage conveyors. Transportation Security Administration officials were at a loss for an explanation and scrambled to send in a team of replacement workers from Cleveland.
This isn’t an easy call, but sometimes the smartest thing to do in an emergency is to suspend security rules. Unfortunately, sometimes the bad guys count on that.
If I were in charge, I would have let people onto the airplanes. The trade-off makes sense to me.
Shura • September 23, 2005 9:29 PM
I think that’s a perfect example of an agenda, again. As you say, it would’ve made sense to let people onto the airplanes; however, whoever actually could’ve made that decision probably thought “if something happens, no matter how unlikely it may be, my head’s gonna roll if it turns out I let people onto the planes without screening – but if I don’t, then the worst that’ll happen is that there’ll be an annoying delay for hundreds of people, but that doesn’t affect me personally”.
An understandable decision, and I’m reasonably sure I would’ve acted the same way if I had been in charge, but still an unfortunate one for those who missed their flights and had to wait.