When Investigation Fails to Prevent Terrorism
I’ve long advocated investigation, intelligence, and emergency response as the places where we can most usefully spend our counterterrorism dollars. Here’s an example where that didn’t work:
Starting in April 1991, three FBI agents posed as members of an invented racist militia group called the Veterans Aryan Movement. According to their cover story, VAM members robbed armored cars, using the proceeds to buy weapons and support racist extremism. The lead agent was a Vietnam veteran with a background in narcotics, using the alias Dave Rossi.
Code-named PATCON, for “Patriot-conspiracy,” the investigation would last more than two years, crossing state and organizational lines in search of intelligence on the so-called Patriot movement, the label applied to a wildly diverse collection of racist, ultra-libertarian, right-wing and/or pro-gun activists and extremists who, over the years, have found common cause in their suspicion and fear of the federal government.
The undercover agents met some of the most infamous names in the movement, but their work never led to a single arrest. When McVeigh walked through the middle of the investigation in 1993, he went unnoticed.
The whole article is worth reading.
Clive Robinson • May 1, 2012 8:11 AM
Irrespective of how good or bad an intel led investigation is, at the end of the day there will always be failures.
For instance a lone individual who is very carefull about what they do can amass a considerable amount of “equipment” to carry out their individual “cause”.
Nothing can prevent this and it’s what we would expect if rational thought is to be used.
Likewise small groups can “stay bellow the radar” if they are close knit and carefull.
But where it goes wrong to often is when a line is crossed and LEO’s push an agender onto others in order to show their work has benifit.