Friday Squid Blogging: Prehistoric Sentient Squid—Or Not
There’s big news in the world of giant squid:
Researchers initially thought that this strange grouping of 45-foot-long marine reptiles had either died en masse from a poisonous plankton bloom or had become stranded in shallow water.
But recent geological analysis of the fossil site indicates that the park was deep underwater when these shonisaurs swam the prehistoric seas. So why were their bones laid in such a bizarre pattern? A new theory suggests that a 100-foot-long cephalopod arranged these bones as a self-portrait after drowning the reptiles
Here’s a good debunking:
There is no direct evidence for the existence of the animal the McMenamins call “the kraken.” No exceptionally preserved body, no fossilized tentacle hooks, no beak—nothing. The McMenamins’ entire case is based on peculiar inferences about the site.
Daniel • October 14, 2011 4:41 PM
The US Supreme Court will be hearing a case this term on a federal law known as the Stolen Valor Act. “The core constitutional issue in the case is whether and to what degree the First Amendment protects false statements of fact.” In other words, can the federal government outlaw lying.
http://www.scotusblog.com/community/the-stolen-valor-act/
I think the interaction of trust and freedom of speech is interesting. How can a society build trust if people are free to lie? But if people are not free to lie then what does freedom of speech mean, anyway. Who gets to decide what is truth and what is a lie? What if the people who are supposed to safeguard the truth turn out to be liars themselves?
There’s a good discussion at the link above.