Bruce Schneier | |||||||||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « Friday Squid Blogging: The Contents of Squid Stomachs | Main | Canada Spending $1B on Security for G8/G20 Summit in June » May 28, 2010Friday Squid Blogging: 500-Million-Year-Old SquidEarly squid: New Canadian research into 500 million-year-old carnivore fossils has revealed an early ancestor of modern-day squids and octopuses, solving the mystery surrounding a previously unclassifiable creature. More: This was one of those confusing, uninterpretable Cambrian animals, represented by only one poorly preserved specimen. Now, 91 new specimens have been dug up and interpreted, and it makes sense to call it a cephalopod. It has two camera eyes—not arthropod-like compound eyes—on stalks, an axial cavity containing paired gills like the mantles of modern cephalopods, and a flexible siphon opening into that cavity. There are also subtle similarities in the structure of the connective tissue in the lateral fins. Obviously, it has a pair of tentacles; no mouthparts have been preserved, but there are hints in the form of dark deposits between the tentacles, which may be all that's left of the mouthparts - and are in the right place for a cephalopod ancestor. Also, this, this, and this. And the paper from Nature. Posted on May 28, 2010 at 4:52 PM • 4 Comments To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. http://thaifood.about.com/od/thaiseafoodrecipes/... reading about squid makes me hungry Posted by: mike at May 29, 2010 10:12 AM Always glad to see a shout-out to my favorite geological era! Even if it's one of the *less* weird fossils... :-) Posted by: Petréa Mitchell at May 29, 2010 2:45 PM Hmm, the artist's conception in the CBC link looks a lot like Anomalocaris but without the obvious segmentation. I haven't read the Nature paper yet, but wouldn't it be interesting if cephalopods where direct descendents? Posted by: Russtopia at May 30, 2010 12:49 PM Sounds dubious. No mouth parts have been preserved in the 500myo fossils (as opposed to blocks of ice) but they'd like to tell us about the specific structure of connective tissue? Posted by: Huh at June 4, 2010 9:57 PM Subscribe to comments on this entry Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type. Photo at top by Geoffrey Stone.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments