Bruce Schneier | |||||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « The Problems of Profiling at Security Checkpoints | Main | ATM Skimmer » January 20, 2010Wrasse Punish CheatersThe bluestreak cleaner wrasse (Labroides dimidiatus) operates an underwater health spa for larger fish. It advertises its services with bright colours and distinctive dances. When customers arrive, the cleaner eats parasites and dead tissue lurking in any hard-to-reach places. Males and females will sometimes operate a joint business, working together to clean their clients. The clients, in return, dutifully pay the cleaners by not eating them. Posted on January 20, 2010 at 1:26 PM • 9 Comments To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. Roger • January 20, 2010 2:18 PM Fascinating -- but not really surprising. The more realistic of the numerous variants of the "Prisoner's dilemma" games have generally shown that in any game that is sustained for a large but unknown number of rounds, the best policy is some sort of "punishment with forgiveness." This example might look like the male wrasse is acting altruistically on behalf of the "client fish", but it is really just looking out for its own interests as the client fish here is playing the role of the warden in Prisoner's dilemma; it is infrastructure, not an actor. We might wonder why only males do this, but the answer is apparent when we read about the unusual sexual biology of this fish. Bluestreak cleaner wrasse are "sequential hermaphrodites", and whenever a male dies the strongest female undergoes a sex change! DayOwl • January 20, 2010 3:28 PM Are we to understand that only females violate the contract? If then, why? Is there a remedy? Sometimes good security means looking past the surface. Juergen • January 20, 2010 3:45 PM As far as I understand the article the males cheat, too, and get away with it because they are bigger. blue92 • January 20, 2010 4:20 PM Roger: The fun thing here is that human altruism can be similarly deconstructed. Is the depth of our altruism in comparison to our finny friend in question merely a function of our own social (and probably neurological) sophistication? What looks at first glance like compassion is often empathetic warm fuzzies, quid pro quo, or, as in this case, social structure with means to an end. Clive Robinson • January 20, 2010 5:59 PM @ Bruce, "Their act of apparent altruism means they get more food in the long run." Actually this may not be the main reason at all. But one of the number of clients, mating and progeny survival. If a female cheats regularly then the most usefull clients will take their business else where not just once but permanently. Thus this makes cheating self limiting in many respects. That is unless there are sufficient clients that it does not matter if they never came back detering the "good meal clients" leaves only the "poor meal clients". This means the female who cheats is less likly to thrive and thus be a less desirable mate as the progeny will be reduced. Thus it is in the males interest to ensure the female thrives by not allowing her to drive away "good meal clients" future visits for a very short term gain. Daughter of Eve • January 23, 2010 11:20 AM This is kinda looking like a patriarchal CYA to me. Simon • January 24, 2010 9:35 AM There's also a 'false cleaner wrasse' that mimics the appearance and behaviour of the real thing. It uses its disguise to get in close and bite a piece out of 'clients' that have been suckered into posing for 'cleaning' (it has much larger teeth). The false cleaner isn't even a wrasse, it's a blenny (Aspidontus taeniatus).
Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type. Photo at top by Geoffrey Stone.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments