Bruce Schneier

 
 

Schneier on Security

A blog covering security and security technology.

« Creating and Entrapping Terrorists | Main | Risk of Knowing Too Much About Risk »

March 5, 2008

SurveillanceSaver

SurveillanceSaver:

SurveillanceSaver is a screensaver for OS X and Windows that shows live images of over 400 network surveillance cameras worldwide.

Posted on March 5, 2008 at 2:23 PM22 CommentsView Blog Reactions

To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter.

Comments

When can we get a version for Linux?

It's free software (GPLv3 license, no less) so I'm a bit surprised there isn't a Linux version already.

Posted by: Curious at March 5, 2008 3:08 PM


This is a fun program, but I have found that with some of hte cameras, coming back from screen saver can take as long as it would take for the images to cycle to the next camera. It became less productive to have it just as a novelty, so I dropped it. Love the idea still!

Posted by: jk at March 5, 2008 3:36 PM


It's only in Alpha release? No thanks.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 5, 2008 3:47 PM


I'd love it if it could hotkey through to a particularly interesting camera--and if it was quicker (and more consistent) to quit back out on key/mouse break. That said, it's more interesting than any of my other SSes. :)

Posted by: Scott K at March 5, 2008 4:37 PM


Now if it could just cycle on a web cam if one was attached ...

At least that would answer the question who is watching the watchers :)

Posted by: xd0s at March 5, 2008 4:44 PM


Yup, slow to resume after a mouse-click or keypress, and after a long wait I've got a crashdump.

I think I'll wait for the beta, or hopefully a linux version.

Posted by: Adrian at March 5, 2008 5:06 PM


For linux users who are fighting for free software and freedom : do you really think a world with people watching each other with surveillance cameras is what you want?

Protecting yourself is good. Spying people is ugly.

Posted by: Christophe-Marie Duquesne at March 5, 2008 5:16 PM


A world where all people have access to the security cameras is a better world, unquestionably.

Posted by: perianwyr at March 5, 2008 7:36 PM


@ perianwyr:

"...where all people..."

Which reminds me of the Don Martin comic where *every passenger* on the plane is carrying a bomb.

Posted by: Chris at March 5, 2008 8:30 PM


Just in case I get homesick for work, eh?

Posted by: Andrew at March 5, 2008 9:48 PM


@Christophe-Marie Duquesne

Good point! I've also noticed that many of todays IP-based surveillance cameras run linux internally (Axis, among others). Maybe something for GPLv4...

Posted by: Pelle at March 6, 2008 1:54 AM


@Curious

You don't need it for linux - just hack webcollage in the xscreensaver package:

http://jwz.livejournal.com/811352.html
http://www.jason0x21.org/webcollage

Posted by: pdkl95 at March 6, 2008 2:16 AM


"A world where all people have access to the security cameras is a better world, unquestionably."

For cameras in public places, maybe (and I'm not even sure about that).

In fact I suspect the main benefit of cameras in public places being accessible to all, is that they'd be a lot less popular and so there would be fewer of them :-)

Posted by: SteveJ at March 6, 2008 4:36 AM


Are any of the cams in the UK? Here, the Data Protection Act counts CCTV images as "Personal Data" which have to be kept securely and their access restricted to authorised people; if not the person responsible for the camera system could be liable for prosecution. Not that the act is ever enforced...

Posted by: TimF at March 6, 2008 6:43 AM


A SETI of security? Intriguing.

To be useful, it needs a feedback feature - a big red button or email response capability that links directly to the originating camera network.

Problems will arise when the untrained get nervous, and when my locality's norms differ from those of the camera's location. The world may get very small, in a more aggressive version of countries taking on western norms and laws in order to qualify for entry to the EU.


Maybe we should try distributed security for airplane security? Let's let the passengers search each other and their belongings, rather than outsourcing it to the TSA. If I was responsible for the security of my flight, I'd take that very seriously, but would also have some concern for the needs of those flying. Randomize the searching and put video of the process up on a bank of wide screen monitors. Have a couple of police in the area for questions and problems.

Posted by: jon at March 6, 2008 7:27 AM


"A SETI of security? Intriguing."

No, it's just intrusion for the sake of titillation. There appears to be no intention that it have benefit for the people who operate the cameras, or the people who appear on them.

Posted by: SteveJ at March 6, 2008 8:29 AM


It's very unstable (alpha version...)

Posted by: Fabrizio at March 6, 2008 8:34 AM


And of course we're sure that no cameras whose feeds weren't intended to be public will ever get on the list...

Posted by: paul at March 6, 2008 8:59 AM


@perianwyr:
"A world where all people have access to the security cameras is a better world, unquestionably."

I just wonder how.

Posted by: Christophe-Marie Duquesne at March 6, 2008 7:32 PM


Because then the watcher can find a way to tell the watched they are being watched, which they are already, but often don't know.

Posted by: Peter E Retep at March 8, 2008 9:48 AM


Meaning
Then then we can all get to know each other better.

Make new friends. Meet new people.

Join the NightWatch tonight.

Posted by: Peter E Retep at March 8, 2008 9:53 AM


Post a comment




E-mail is optional and will not be displayed on the site.


Remember Me?


Powered by Movable Type. Photo at top by Steve Woit.

Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT.

 
Bruce Schneier