Bruce Schneier | |||||||||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « Another Schneier Interview | Main | Dutch RFID Transit Card Hacked » January 18, 2008Friday Squid Blogging: National Geographic Giant Squid PhotoIt's dead. Posted on January 18, 2008 at 4:51 PM • 10 Comments • View Blog Reactions To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. Why would you link to the giant squid slide when the Colossal Squid, which was bigger, was the #1 photo? Posted by: Billy at January 18, 2008 5:42 PM > It's dead [laugh] Bruce must be in a hurry to get his posts up today. Bruce Schneier, you're up next on, "State The Obvious!" Posted by: Pat Cahalan at January 18, 2008 7:03 PM "[laugh] Bruce must be in a hurry to get his posts up today." Are you kidding? I have squid blogging posts backed up for weeks. It's by far the easiest thing I do here on this blog. Regularly I get e-mails and blog comments of this sort: "Can we have fewer squid posts and more security posts," like there's some conservation law at work: for every squid posts I write, I write one fewer security post. I assure you all that that's just not true. Friday squid blogging is an extra treat, and not a substitute for substantive -- or cursory -- security posts. Posted by: Bruce Schneier at January 19, 2008 12:12 AM "Why would you link to the giant squid slide when the Colossal Squid, which was bigger, was the #1 photo?" I was saving it for next week. Posted by: Bruce Schneier at January 19, 2008 12:18 AM "Scientists at the time suspected that the wounds were the result of a raucous sexual encounter, suggesting that giant squid may breed nearby." I'd pay to see a video of that encounter, but I'm sure it's illegal in some jurisdictions ... Posted by: squidlicious ... at January 19, 2008 12:23 AM Sorry for the question, but what kind of background does your blogging about squids have? For sure, this question came up at least a thousand times and more, but i never found any hints for that. Is it just fascination about this kind of creatures, their body-structure, or is it in any way combined with your security-work, because they are so seldom and have many secrets to discover? This question is burning (in?) me since i first saw these postings, which came up regularily. Well, since this is the first time posting any comments here, i want to use the time to say: Thanks for all your work, the things which can be learned by reading and all the fish. ;) Posted by: Flo at January 19, 2008 9:49 AM Thats what I'd like to know, what is it with Posted by: vin at January 19, 2008 1:26 PM Why does it seem to baffle Marine Biologists that creatures which live 500 - 1000 meters below sea level die in sea level tanks in just a few hours. Would they be equally baffled if I was imploded by the pressure of exposure to a 1000 meter depth without a protective suit or vehicle? Posted by: rdivilbiss at January 20, 2008 10:45 PM If that squid is really 26 feet long, just what size are the rubber boots in the picture? Posted by: Tim at January 21, 2008 7:47 AM > Are you kidding? Yes. See, the joke was that you commented that it was dead, when the picture is obviously of a dead squid. Because that's funny. Right? So "State the Obvious" is a game show, and... Never mind. (FWIW, I like the squid blog posts) :) Posted by: Pat Cahalan at January 22, 2008 6:26 PM Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type. Photo at top by Steve Woit.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments