Secretly Recording Interrogations
It’s getting easier to watch the watchers:
A teen suspect’s snap decision to secretly record his interrogation with an MP3 player has resulted in a perjury case against a veteran detective and a plea deal for the teen.
Unaware of the recording, Detective Christopher Perino insisted under oath at a trial in April that suspect Erik Crespo wasn’t questioned about a shooting in the Bronx.
But the defense confronted the detective with a transcript it said proved he had spent more than an hour unsuccessfully trying to persuade Crespo to confess.
Perino was arraigned today on 12 counts of first-degree perjury and freed on bail.
My guess is that this sort of perjury occurs more than we realize. If there’s one place I think cameras should be rolling at all times, it’s in police station interrogation rooms. And no erasing the tapes either. (And those tapes must have been really damning. Old interrogation tapes can yield valuable intelligence; you don’t ever erase them unless you absolutely have to.)
Shane • December 11, 2007 12:53 PM
What strikes me as surprising is that the recording was admitted into evidence. I guess I was always under the impression that conversations recorded in that manner where not admissible in court.
This actually makes me a bit upset, considering I did this very same thing during the ‘we have to let you go’ speech my former employers gave me, which was so incredibly illegal that I could’ve owned the company had I believed the tape admissible as evidence. I was told by a lawyer that it was not, so I signed my severance agreement, and they got off free and clear.
Kudos to the teenager though.