ChoicePoint Says "Please Regulate Me"
According to ChoicePoint’s most recent 8-K filing:
Based on information currently available, we estimate that approximately 145,000 consumers from 50 states and other territories may have had their personal information improperly accessed as a result of the recent Los Angeles incident and certain other instances of unauthorized access to our information products. Approximately 35,000 of these consumers are California residents, and approximately 110,000 are residents of other states. These numbers were determined by conducting searches of our databases that matched searches conducted by customers who we believe may have had unauthorized access to our information products on or after July 1, 2003, the effective date of the California notification law. Because our databases are constantly updated, our search results will never be identical to the search results of these customers.
Catch that? ChoicePoint actually has no idea if only 145,000 customers were affected by its recent security debacle. But it’s not doing any work to determine if more than 145,000 customers were affected—or if any customers before July 1, 2003 were affected—because there’s no law compelling it to do so.
I have no idea why ChoicePoint has decided to tape a huge “Please Regulate My Industry” sign to its back, but it’s increasingly obvious that it has. There’s a class-action shareholders’ lawsuit, but I don’t think that will be enough.
And, by the way, Choicepoint’s database is riddled with errors.
Saar Drimer • March 9, 2005 3:39 PM
“I have no idea why ChoicePoint has “I have no idea why ChoicePoint has decided to tape a huge “Please Regulate My Industry””
Isn’t this the best way for them to acknowledge a problem without admitting guilt? This tactic points the finger at somebody else – lack of outside regulation. It also creates the perception of them being the victim, not the offender.
The fact that the data they present is largly wrong is very interesting. I would sure like to see my ChoicePoint version of me. Would be an interesting research topic.