The Realities of AI Video Surveillance

The Financial Times has a good article on how AI is changing the capabilities of video surveillance, with information from both Israel/Iran and Russia.

In contrast with older tools restricted to a few dozen preset searches, these new tools allow an almost unlimited range of enquiries by enabling language-based searches on video.

That lets intelligence officers hunt through massive streams of videos using simple search terms, such as two men handing a bag to each other; a person who has changed their appearance, or has changed clothes multiple times in a day; or a vehicle that has recently been painted over, or has driven past the same spot several times in a short period.

“This is the holy grail of surveillance,” said a European official whose country uses the technology on its cities. “We are able to look for behaviour, not objects—it has created a world of new possibilities.”

I wrote about this sort of thing a few years ago, how AI enables mass spying in the way that computers and networks enabled mass surveillance. The interesting development in the article is that AI allows people to ask natural language questions about video footage to AIs—and AIs can answer them.

Posted on June 30, 2026 at 8:05 AM12 Comments

Comments

Rontea June 30, 2026 10:19 AM

In the cold theater of human obedience, mass surveillance is the silent usher, guiding our steps without ever laying a hand on us. It watches, collects, and remembers; and in that memory, we begin to walk straighter, speak softer, and avert our eyes from rebellion. But mass spying—ah, that is the confession booth without a priest, the echo of our own whispers returned as judgment. When every secret is captured, sorted, and understood, the soul itself trembles into conformity. Surveillance freezes our gestures; spying freezes our thoughts. Under the regime of knowing everything we do, we grow careful. Under the regime of knowing everything we say, we grow voiceless. This is the perfection of the chilling effect: a world where man becomes his own jailer, fearful even of his own mind.

Eric Blair June 30, 2026 12:26 PM

It is now trivial to create lists. The identifiers already mark every citizen in one way or another. DOGE’s ransacking and exfiltration of sensitive databases have allowed even more detail to be collected and collated.

The two main things that restrain the would-be authoritarian are 1) the legal system that oversees the police and military who are empowered to implement it, and 2) the fact that there are more of us than there are of them, by many factors of magnitude.

The Stasi never had computers, nor a citizenry with trackable cell phones in every pocket. However the cell phones in our pockets also have video cameras capable of recording and reporting misdeeds, thus enabling potential accountability.

What the authoritarian fears most is a full sunlit reckoning.

Clive Robinson June 30, 2026 12:30 PM

@ Bruce, ALL,

The most frightening sentence in the part of the article you quote,

“We are able to look for behaviour, not objects ­ it has created a world of new possibilities.”

There is a catch phrase from a TV Show that was,

“Unlimited Possibilities”

Recent investigations have shown police sending in “AI Generated Evidence” to courts and getting away with it…

So faking evidence is a new AI Possibility…

Rontea June 30, 2026 12:57 PM

@Clive
Re: So faking evidence is a new AI Possibility…

In the thirst for knowledge, man now teaches machines to lie? What a tragic comedy, where intelligence imitates ignorance and calls itself progress. Beware: when truth becomes negotiable, even the cleverest inventions serve only the abyss.”

KC June 30, 2026 1:55 PM

Should I be a little surprised a European official is so forwardly enthusiastic? Will their surveillance implementations have more privacy and data handling safeguards?

Snarki, child of Loki June 30, 2026 2:14 PM

“AI, generate a video of cop X sitting at a terminal, creating the fake evidence against me.”

“How about I just replay my session with cop X?”

“That’s even better.”

Zsolt June 30, 2026 6:14 PM

Reminds me a bit of Minority Report.

In the 24 year old movie retinal scans (from a distance!) became a thing and a major privacy concern. In reality facial recognition has become the real privacy killer, but the effects are similar. Also, the movie did not really think about artifical intelligence, robotics, etc. I guess they didn’t want to steal the show from Cruise. 🙂

astrologer tejas July 1, 2026 3:22 AM

AI video surveillance enhances security by detecting unusual activities, analyzing patterns, and improving monitoring efficiency in real time.

However, it also raises concerns about privacy, data security, and the potential for errors or bias in automated decision-making.

Who? July 3, 2026 7:04 AM

@ Clive Robinson

Recent investigations have shown police sending in “AI Generated Evidence” to courts and getting away with it…

Of course, human beings faking evidences is illegal. Nothing says an AI cannot fake evidences, so they are accepted in court. Obviously, police knows these evidences are fake, but who cares?

Human laws are fragile.

anonymouse random July 3, 2026 2:07 PM

@Clive Robinson: …Recent investigations have shown police sending in “AI Generated Evidence” to courts and getting away with it….

Cite(s) please. The Watchers always need watching.

Clive Robinson July 3, 2026 4:29 PM

@ anonymouse random, ALL,

There are very many UK news reports including that of the BBC on this and a simple DuckDuck pulls many of them up. Why you chose to not do so I’ll leave for others to judge you.

So as our host used to write for one of the newspapers I’ll use their URL,

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jun/12/police-officer-under-criminal-investigation-over-alleged-use-of-ai

I need to note that under UK legislation the “presumption of innocence” holds untill after an judicial proceedings have concluded, or the person in question pleads guilty. Hence words like “alleged” and sketchy details are what you will find in all the reporting because “Contempt of Court” is not something you would wish to spend any time in Jail for (technically tou don’t go to prison for contempt unless in the process you break the law).

So other than the Police Force involved the information is at best sparse currently.

What has not been said and it might be important is what the Police Officer used the AI for…

They could have used it like a glorified spell and grammar checker.

To format or pad a report up.

Through to,

Manufacturing false evidence.

The seriousness it is being given suggests it’s either considered novel/naive or nearer the latter which some have intimated in their reporting by the use of the word “criminal”.

@ ALL,

I do wish people would first do some basic searching before screaming “citation”. The reason I’ve cut back on them a lot is two fold,

1, Some readers find them objectional and have said so in the past (so “damned if you do damned if you don’t).

2, The auto-mod pulls a post for many reasons one of which appears to be too many or the wrong sort of links. Finding out which is messy at best and involves the likes of the “Binary chop” or similar breaking into parts, which can cause other issues with the auto-mod.

Leave a comment

Blog moderation policy

Login

Allowed HTML <a href="URL"> • <em> <cite> <i> • <strong> <b> • <sub> <sup> • <ul> <ol> <li> • <blockquote> <pre> Markdown Extra syntax via https://michelf.ca/projects/php-markdown/extra/

Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.