How Hackers Are Thinking About AI

Interesting paper: “What hackers talk about when they talk about AI: Early-stage diffusion of a cybercrime innovation.

Abstract: The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) is raising concerns about its potential to transform cybercrime. Beyond empowering novice offenders, AI stands to intensify the scale and sophistication of attacks by seasoned cybercriminals. This paper examines the evolving relationship between cybercriminals and AI using a unique dataset from a cyber threat intelligence platform. Analyzing more than 160 cybercrime forum conversations collected over seven months, our research reveals how cybercriminals understand AI and discuss how they can exploit its capabilities. Their exchanges reflect growing curiosity about AI’s criminal applications through legal tools and dedicated criminal tools, but also doubts and anxieties about AI’s effectiveness and its effects on their business models and operational security. The study documents attempts to misuse legitimate AI tools and develop bespoke models tailored for illicit purposes. Combining the diffusion of innovation framework with thematic analysis, the paper provides an in-depth view of emerging AI-enabled cybercrime and offers practical insights for law enforcement and policymakers.

Posted on April 14, 2026 at 6:49 AM5 Comments

Comments

Clive Robinson April 14, 2026 8:47 AM

@ Bruce, ALL,

With regards the article saying,

“The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) is raising concerns about its potential to transform cybercrime. Beyond empowering novice offenders, AI stands to intensify the scale and sophistication of attacks by seasoned cybercriminals.”

What a very limited outlook.

In the past I’ve pointed out that nearly all “cybercrime” is actually just a re-working of a traditional “tangible physical world” crime into the “intangible information world” where it has certain advantages “army of one” and “cross border” being but two of many.

Thus I suspect that I may not be the only one who has given consideration to non cyber activities assisted by AI.

And was thus not surprised when the idiots in the executive “Department of War” threw the toys out of the pram a week or so back.

The Dept o’War are obviously desperate to have AI find them ways out of the repeated kinetic messes they keep getting themselves into. Thus they want “the magic of AI” to pull there asses out of the piles of crap of their own creating…

So what ever you do, do not make the mistake of thinking AI is for “cyber only” it is most certainly not.

Marc jr. Landolt April 14, 2026 8:53 AM

I’ll phrase it as a mathematical formula or logical equation:

CLAIM:
(In mathematics/logic, a claim can be either TRUE or FALSE)

“In 20 years, Switzerland will be the world’s most powerful neuro-colonial power.”

and i even created a cool graphics for this claim

https://t.me/HackersCardgameChat/13585

👽👽👽👽 👽👽👽👽
👽👽👽 👽👽👽
👽👽👽 👽👽👽
👽 👽
👽 👽
👽👽👽 👽👽👽
👽👽👽 👽👽👽
👽👽👽👽 👽👽👽👽

ResearcherZero April 14, 2026 10:46 PM

How can we use it for pranks?

Default passwords allowed upload of custom recordings to crosswalk announcements.

It took place a year ago, with comments that sound like Musk, Bezos and Zuckerberg. Who ever altered the recordings preserved the function of announcements so that people could still cross the street safely and had little trouble in pulling off the prank, as Polara ships its devices with a default password of 1234.

Local authorities were unprepared and could not work out who had altered the recordings.

‘https://www.wired.com/story/crosswalk-city-hack-cybersecurity-lessons/

Amused Californians filmed the new crosswalk announcements and posted them on X.
https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/14/silicon-valley-crosswalk-buttons-hacked-to-imitate-musk-zuckerberg-voices/

Law enforcement were underfunded in the humor department.
https://www.paloaltoonline.com/technology/2025/04/12/silicon-valley-crosswalk-buttons-apparently-hacked-to-imitate-musk-zuckerberg-voices/

ResearcherZero April 14, 2026 10:49 PM

AI generated Musk recording discusses Trump’s tenderness:

‘https://packaged-media.redd.it/eg2b4xnc6jue1/pb/m2-res_480p.mp4?m=DASHPlaylist.mpd&c=wh_ben_en&var=sgpssan&v=1&e=1776236400&s=e716da278a410eae4cccad4e8aac9f0947c0eaac

(may contain traces of nuts)

Rontea April 15, 2026 3:59 PM

Cybercriminals are always early adopters of new technology, and artificial intelligence is no exception. What’s striking here is that these actors are demonstrating both opportunism and caution: they’re experimenting with AI for illicit purposes, but they remain uncertain about its real-world utility. This is a familiar pattern. Just as with encryption or anonymization tools in the past, attackers will test, iterate, and eventually normalize AI in their workflows if it provides a measurable advantage. The real risk isn’t simply that AI lowers technical barriers for criminals—it’s that it accelerates the speed at which new attack methods are created, shared, and refined. Defensive strategies must anticipate that evolution, not react to it.

Leave a comment

Blog moderation policy

Login

Allowed HTML <a href="URL"> • <em> <cite> <i> • <strong> <b> • <sub> <sup> • <ul> <ol> <li> • <blockquote> <pre> Markdown Extra syntax via https://michelf.ca/projects/php-markdown/extra/

Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.