Securing Communications in a Trump Administration
Susan Landau has an excellent essay on why it’s more important than ever to have backdoor-free encryption on our computer and communications systems.
Protecting the privacy of speech is crucial for preserving our democracy. We live at a time when tracking an individual—a journalist, a member of the political opposition, a citizen engaged in peaceful protest—or listening to their communications is far easier than at any time in human history. Political leaders on both sides now have a responsibility to work for securing communications and devices. This means supporting not only the laws protecting free speech and the accompanying communications, but also the technologies to do so: end-to-end encryption and secured devices; it also means soundly rejecting all proposals for front-door exceptional access. Prior to the election there were strong, sound security arguments for rejecting such proposals. The privacy arguments have now, suddenly, become critically important as well. Threatened authoritarianism means that we need technological protections for our private communications every bit as much as we need the legal ones we presently have.
Unfortunately, the trend is moving in the other direction. The UK just passed the Investigatory Powers Act, giving police and intelligence agencies incredibly broad surveillance powers with very little oversight. And Bits of Freedom just reported that “Croatia, Italy, Latvia, Poland and Hungary all want an EU law to be created to help their law enforcement authorities access encrypted information and share data with investigators in other countries.”
ramriot • November 23, 2016 2:21 PM
In the UK case the more important element is logging.
Even without exceptional access (backdoors), the metadata in communications is of often far greater use than the actual content of same. Thus anything that extends the tendency for truncating logs to a set minimum time period puts everyones history under possible scrutiny.
Be that from your local magistrate or worse an international criminal organisation. Even the head of the collective body of ISP’s in the UK has said that having mandatory logging no matter how carefully it is secured is just way to tempting for it to remain secure for long.