Comments
Archon • January 30, 2015 6:59 PM
@David Dyer-Bennet: Maybe they could be Bruce and “The Bruce”. No idea if the “the” should be stressed like “THE Bruce” or if it could be more like a Robert the Bruce thing, only without the Robert.
Paul Renault • January 31, 2015 8:10 AM
David, Archon, et all: are any of the directors from the University of Woolamaloo?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_f_p0CgPeyA
Jeroen • January 31, 2015 12:22 PM
Had to laugh hard at F-Secure blocking http://www.channelweb.co.uk/crn-uk/news/2392248/co3-poaches-heavy-hitters-for-european-push
Andy • January 31, 2015 5:05 PM
Co3 OPSEC failure.
Bruce Schneier • February 1, 2015 7:24 AM
“Co3 OPSEC failure.”
Or clever leaking strategy.
Sometimes it’s hard to tell which.
Andy • February 2, 2015 11:16 AM
‘”Co3 OPSEC failure.”
Or clever leaking strategy.
Sometimes it’s hard to tell which.’
Argh, I’ve fallen for “media manipulation”. 🙂
Subscribe to comments on this entry
Leave a comment
Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.
David Dyer-Bennet • January 30, 2015 5:57 PM
So, reading the channelweb.uk article, I have to say this could cause a bit of confusion. Maybe we should just call you all “Bruce”?