A Problem with the US Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board
I haven’t heard much about the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. They recently held hearings regarding the Snowden documents.
This particular comment stood out:
Rachel Brand, another seemingly unsympathetic board member, concluded: “There is nothing that is more harmful to civil liberties than terrorism. This discussion here has been quite sterile because we have not been talking about terrorism.”
If terrorism harms civil liberties, it’s because elected officials react in panic and revoke them.
I’m not optimistic about this board.
QnJ1Y2U • July 16, 2013 7:28 AM
Also in the article:
James Dempsey, a PCLOB member … suggested the scale of intelligence that needed to be collected made it difficult to see how authorities could go back to granting individual warrants rather than blanket approvals.
So, because we’re collecting lots of data we need approval to collect lots of data. I hope he was somehow misquoted, because otherwise that’s some painful logic.