Bruce Schneier | |||||||||||
Schneier on SecurityA blog covering security and security technology. « "Bruce Schneier and the King of the Crabs" | Main | Friday Squid Blogging: Cuttlefish Embryos Can See » June 13, 2008Article on SchneierFrom The Star in Malaysia. Posted on June 13, 2008 at 2:41 PM • 10 Comments To receive these entries once a month by e-mail, sign up for the Crypto-Gram Newsletter. Bob • June 13, 2008 4:12 PM Just FYI, this page won't load in firefox for me. Error Message: Content Encoding Error * Please contact the web site owners to inform them of this problem. Davi Ottenheimer • June 13, 2008 4:21 PM "no matter what you do to beef up security, it will not be enough" And yet... "That’s how crime or threats work, Schneier said, where there are always levels which are deemed acceptable." In other words, we know that nothing will be enough in an absolute sense, but we can determine a level and call it "acceptable". I agree. By the way, it seems that someone decided that your article was acceptable but did not do enough checking... "Schneider admits that none of the measures are foolproof." Yeah, just like spelling your name right. Hairy Dude • June 13, 2008 8:17 PM @Bob: I got that as well. Ctrl-Shift-R (cache-bypassing reload) seems to fix it. Zarutian • June 13, 2008 8:46 PM What about POLA (principle of least authority/access) and object-capabilities (which combine designation and authorization into one thing: an unforgible reference)? Sure, those arent any magic or siver bullets but never the less they are an start of an solution of making computer security unintrusive and usable. http://www.eros-os.org/essays/capintro.html is an good intro to capabilities. Also see http://erights.org/ for more about this stuff. With hope of intersting dialogue. Baylink • June 16, 2008 12:13 PM Even accounting for the cultural difference, and the language difference, some of those quotes *still* don't sound like you, Bruce. How badly did they mangle your meaning? CipherChaos • June 17, 2008 2:03 PM @Bruce Schneier From the article: Umm... I can't imagine this having come from you, Bruce. Surely, you'd be one to advocate transparent, full hard-drive encryption (like TrueCrypt or LUKS), right? Bruce Schneier • June 17, 2008 10:48 PM @ CipherChaos The only thing I can think of is that was something I wrote years ago, when it was true.
Post a comment
Powered by Movable Type. Photo at top by Geoffrey Stone.
Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT. |
|
Comments