_DARGS=/cabelas/en/common/catalog/item-link.jsp_A&_DAV=SEARCH_RESULTS_NYR&id=0012212113670a&navCount=10&podId=0012212&parentId=&masterpathid=&navAction=push&catalogCode=IJ&rid=&parentType=&indexId=cat600178&hasJS=true

if you add that, then the link would work.

alternatively, just click on this:

http://www.cabelas.com/cabelas/en/templates/...

and then click on the original post link, and you should see the squid kit magically appear but ymmv.

smells like IBM to me.

Anonymous • May 9, 2008 7:05 PM

http://www.cabelas.com/cabelas/en/templates/...

yonodeler • May 9, 2008 11:15 PM

Weedless and linkless versions available.

Erik N • May 10, 2008 5:12 AM

That page is temporarily unavailable, meanwhile, wired.com has a great article on colossal squid:

http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/...

Anonymous • May 11, 2008 9:14 PM

I can just see the hit counters at Cabela's going unexpectedly crazy. "Hey, there's all these customers hitting the squid lures page, but no sell-through. And they all have this weird Schneier guy's blog as the 'Referer'."

greg • May 12, 2008 11:43 AM

Not to be pedantic, but those aren't squid fishing lures, they are squid lures used for fishing. You wouldn't be able to catch squid fishing with those lures.

These are squid fishing lures:

http://www.squidjig.com/

the lures you posted are useful to catch a wide variety of predators to squid, but not to catch squid themselves.

yonodeler • May 13, 2008 12:59 AM

Using “fishing” in reference to fish can hardly be wrong.

Post a comment

Schneier.com is a personal website. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT.

Subscribe via Kindle

Blog Menu

Search

Powered by DuckDuckGo

Blog Home Page
100 Latest Comments

Archives by Date

2013 J F M A M
2012 J F M A M J J A S O N D
2011 J F M A M J J A S O N D
2010 J F M A M J J A S O N D
2009 J F M A M J J A S O N D
2008 J F M A M J J A S O N D
2007 J F M A M J J A S O N D
2006 J F M A M J J A S O N D
2005 J F M A M J J A S O N D
2004 J F M A M J J A S O N D