AT&T Rewrites its Privacy Policy
AT&T has a new privacy policy, and if you are its customer you have no choice but to accept it.
The new policy says that AT&T—not customers—owns customers’ confidential info and can use it “to protect its legitimate business interests, safeguard others, or respond to legal process.”
The policy also indicates that AT&T will track the viewing habits of customers of its new video service—something that cable and satellite providers are prohibited from doing.
Moreover, AT&T (formerly known as SBC) is requiring customers to agree to its updated privacy policy as a condition for service—a new move that legal experts say will reduce customers’ recourse for any future data sharing with government authorities or others.
EDITED TO ADD (6/27): User Friendly on the issue.
Owen Blacker • June 23, 2006 6:38 AM
In English law we have something called the Unfair Contract Terms Act (well, two of them, actually: a 1977 act and a 1999 act; a Google for “unfair contract terms” will pull up plenty of links, though beware that our government departments change their websites and break all the links quite frequently).
I would contest that such a clause in a contract would be rendered null and void by an English court. (Though, of course, that means someone would have to sue, though Legal Aid might be available to do so, if noone wanted to take it on pro bono.)
Do you not have anything similar in the US? I know you have no real right to privacy (other than the unreasonable searches and seizures provision in the Fourth Amendment), but surely American contract law must contain some kind of provision for one-sided contracts (like EULAs, for example)?