Richard Clarke Advised New York City Subway Searches
Now this is a surprise. Richard Clarke advised New York City to perform those pointless subway searches:
Mr. Clarke, a former counterterrorism adviser to two presidents, received widespread attention last year for his criticism of President Bush’s response to the Sept. 11 attacks, detailed in a searing memoir and in security testimony before the 9/11 Commission.
Unknown to the public, until recently, was Mr. Clarke’s role in advising New York City officials in helping to devise the “container inspection program” that the Police Department began in July after two attacks on the transit system in London.
Seems that his goal wasn’t to deter terrorism, but simply to move it from the New York City subways to another target; perhaps the Boston subways?
“Obviously you want to catch people with bombs on their back, but there is a value to a program that doesn’t stop everyone and isn’t compulsory,” he said in a deposition.
Mr. Clarke later added, “The goal here is to impart to the terrorists a sense that there is an enhanced security program, to deter them from going into the New York subway and choosing that as a target.”
Zwack • November 8, 2005 1:35 PM
Bruce, Are you surprised?
A lot of “anti-terrorism security” seems to have two goals…
1) Make it look like we are doing something so we can get re-elected.
2) Emphasise that we are protecting X heavily so that the terrorists don’t attack X. We don’t care if they attack Y, but we don’t want them to attack X.
If the terrorists attack the Boston subway instead of the New York Subway then New York officials get to say “See, our security program is worthwhile as we were saved because of it.” If the terrorists instead attack shopping malls in New York then they will say “Who could have known that they were going to attack Malls, we’ll increase security there now. They didn’t attack the subway because of our program…” Finally if the terrorists don’t attack then they say “See, our program stopped them from attacking our subway which is an important target.”
As far as they are concerned it’s win-win. Whatever the terrorists do they come out ahead.
Given that the goal is to be seen to be doing something then the program is a success. If the goal was to protect against terrorist attack then perhaps they wouldn’t do this… But that is not the goal.
Z.